Health Care Analysis 18 (2):103-112 (2010)
AbstractThe purpose of this study was to explore the views of members of the general public regarding ethical issues in adult predictive genetic testing. The literature pertaining to ethical issues regarding to adult predictive genetic testing is largely restricted to the views of ‘experts’ who have emphasized informed consent, patent issues, and insurance discrimination. Occasionally the views of patients who have undergone genetic counselling and testing have been elicited, adding psychosocial and family issues. However, the general public has not had the opportunity to contribute. In order to explore theatre as a health policy research tool, 1,200 audience members attended the play ‘Sarah’s Daughters’ in seven Canadian cities, following which audience discussions were audiotaped. This study performed a secondary qualitative analysis of the data to identify the ethical issues of adult predictive genetic testing important to members of the general public. The identified issues were: (1) need for public education; (2) choice to undergo genetic counselling and testing; (3) access to genetic counselling and testing; and (4) obligations regarding the handling of genetic information. Audience members emphasized public education and access to information regarding potential choices, which was different from the emphasis on informed consent and other ethical issues prominent in the literature. Members of the general public emphasized ethical issues that were different than those identified by experts and patients. It is essential that members of the public be included in complex and controversial public policy decisions
Similar books and articles
Ethical issues in predictive genetic testing: a public health perspective.K. G. Fulda - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (3):143-147.
Predictive genetic testing for conditions that present in childhood.Lainie Friedman Ross - 2002 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (3):225-244.
Modern Advances in Genetic Testing: Ethical Challenges and Training Implications for Current and Future Psychologists.Leah S. Richmond-Rakerd - 2013 - Ethics and Behavior 23 (1):31-43.
Predictive Genetic Testing, Autonomy and Responsibility for Future Health.Elisabeth Hildt - 2009 - Medicine Studies 1 (2):143-153.
The ethical challenges of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.Cheryl Berg & Kelly Fryer-Edwards - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 77 (1):17 - 31.
Predictive Testing for Huntington's Disease in Adolescents: Part 2.Mariam Ghosn - 2007 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 12 (3):3.
Genetic testing: The appropriate means for a desired goal?Inmaculada de Melo-Martín - 2006 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (3):167-177.
Parental authority, future autonomy, and assessing risks of predictive genetic testing in Minors.A. Boyce & P. Borry - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (3):379-385.
Private and public eugenics: Genetic testing and screening in india. [REVIEW]Jyotsna Agnihotri Gupta - 2007 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (3):217-228.
Commercial genetic testing in mainland china: Social, financial and ethical issues. [REVIEW]Suli Sui & Margaret Sleeboom-Faulkner - 2007 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (3):229-237.
Working up policy : the use of specific disease exemplars in formulating general principles governing childhood genetic testing. [REVIEW]Paula Boddington & Susan Hogben - 2006 - Health Care Analysis 14 (1):1-13.
Genetic testing: a conceptual exploration.R. L. Zimmern - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (2):151-156.
Ethics and genetics: Susceptibility testing in the workplace.Chris MacDonald & Bryn Williams-Jones - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 35 (3):235-241.
From Figures to Values: The Implicit Ethical Judgements in our Measures of Health.P. Vineis & R. Satolli - 2012 - Public Health Ethics 5 (1):22-28.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation.Lynn J. Frewer & Gene Rowe - 2000 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 25 (1):3-29.
Balancing autonomy and responsibility: the ethics of generating and disclosing genetic information.Nina Hallowell, Claire Foster, Ros Eeles, A. Ardern-Jones, Veronica Murday & Maggie Watson - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (2):74-79.
Are genetic self-tests dangerous? Assessing the commercialization of genetic testing in terms of personal autonomy.Ludvig Beckman - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (5-6):387-398.
Balancing autonomy and responsibility: the ethics of generating and disclosing genetic information * Commentary * Author's reply.N. Hallowell - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (2):74-79.
Cancer Genetic Susceptibility Testing: Ethical and Policy Implications for Future Research and Clinical Practice.Benjamin S. Wilfond, Karen H. Rothenberg, Elizabeth J. Thomson & Caryn Lerman - 1997 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 25 (4):243-251.