Resolving Disagreement Through Mutual Respect

Erkenntnis 78 (4):881-898 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper explores the scope and limits of rational consensus through mutual respect, with the primary focus on the best known formal model of consensus: the Lehrer–Wagner model. We consider various arguments against the rationality of the Lehrer–Wagner model as a model of consensus about factual matters. We conclude that models such as this face problems in achieving rational consensus on disagreements about unknown factual matters, but that they hold considerable promise as models of how to rationally resolve non-factual disagreements.

Similar books and articles

Toward Understanding Reasoned Resolution of Disagreement.Don Fawkes - 2006 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 13 (1):56-62.
Individualism, Communitarianism and Consensus.Keith Lehrer - 2001 - The Journal of Ethics 5 (2):105-120.
Are Ethical Conflicts Irreconcilable?Maeve Cooke - 1997 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 23 (2):1-19.
Objectivity, Disagreement, and Projectibility.Paul Seabright - 1988 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 31 (1):25 – 51.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-06-08

Downloads
691 (#12,187)

6 months
66 (#12,472)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Carlo Martini
Tilburg University
Jan Sprenger
University of Turin
Mark Colyvan
University of Sydney

References found in this work

Epistemology of Disagreement: The Good News.David Christensen - 2007 - Philosophical Review 116 (2):187-217.
Reflection and Disagreement.Adam Elga - 2007 - Noûs 41 (3):478–502.
Peer Disagreement and Higher Order Evidence.Thomas Kelly - 2010 - In Alvin I. Goldman & Dennis Whitcomb (eds.), Social Epistemology: Essential Readings. Oxford University Press. pp. 183--217.
The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement.Thomas Kelly - 2005 - In Tamar Szabó Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology, Volume 1. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 167-196.

View all 28 references / Add more references