NanoEthics 2 (1):43-60 (2008)
Risk management of nanotechnology is challenged by the enormous uncertainties about the risks, benefits, properties, and future direction of nanotechnology applications. Because of these uncertainties, traditional risk management principles such as acceptable risk, cost–benefit analysis, and feasibility are unworkable, as is the newest risk management principle, the precautionary principle. Yet, simply waiting for these uncertainties to be resolved before undertaking risk management efforts would not be prudent, in part because of the growing public concerns about nanotechnology driven by risk perception heuristics such as affect and availability. A more reflexive, incremental, and cooperative risk management approach is required, which not only will help manage emerging risks from nanotechnology applications, but will also create a new risk management model for managing future emerging technologies.
|Keywords||Nanotechnology Regulation Risk management Risk perception Heuristics Voluntary programs|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic & Amos Tversky (eds.) - 1982 - Cambridge University Press.
Transnational Models for Regulation of Nanotechnology.Gary E. Marchant & Douglas J. Sylvester - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 34 (4):714-725.
Nanotechnology: The Challenge of Regulating Known Unknowns.Robin Fretwell Wilson - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 34 (4):704-713.
Citations of this work BETA
Wide Reflective Equilibrium as a Normative Model for Responsible Governance.Neelke Doorn - 2013 - NanoEthics 7 (1):29-43.
Temporal Perspectives of the Nanotechnological Challenge to Regulation: How Human Rights Can Contribute to the Present and Future of Nanotechnologies.Daniele Ruggiu - 2013 - NanoEthics 7 (3):201-215.
Do New Ethical Issues Arise at Each Stage of Nanotechnological Development?Céline Kermisch - 2012 - NanoEthics 6 (1):29-37.
Nanoethics—A Collaboration Across Disciplines.Anna Julie Rasmussen, Mette Ebbesen & Svend Andersen - 2012 - NanoEthics 6 (3):185-193.
Editors' Overview: Forbidding Science? [REVIEW]Gary E. Marchant & Stephanie J. Bird - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):263-269.
Similar books and articles
Antibiotic Resistance Due to Modern Agricultural Practices: An Ethical Perspective. [REVIEW]Joan Duckenfield - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (2):333-350.
We Already Have Risk Management – Do We Really Need the Precautionary Principle?Alan Randall - unknown
Ethics of Risk Analysis and Regulatory Review: From Bio- to Nanotechnology. [REVIEW]Jennifer Kuzma & John C. Besley - 2008 - NanoEthics 2 (2):149-162.
Risk and Responsibility: A Complex and Evolving Relationship.Céline Kermisch - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):91-102.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads58 ( #87,970 of 2,153,332 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #225,818 of 2,153,332 )
How can I increase my downloads?