Respect the Author: a Research Ethical Principle for Readers

Journal of Academic Ethics 19 (2):175-185 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Much of contemporary research ethics was developed in the latter half of the twentieth century as a response to the unethical treatment of human beings in biomedical research. Research ethical considerations have subsequently been extended to cover topics in the sciences and technology such as data handling, precautionary measures, engineering codes of conduct, and more. However, moral issues in the humanities have gained less attention from research ethicists. This article proposes an ethical principle for reading for research purposes: Respect the author.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Rethinking the Belmont Report?Phoebe Friesen, Lisa Kearns, Barbara Redman & Arthur L. Caplan - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (7):15-21.
The responsible conduct of basic and clinical research.Andrzej Górski - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):3-4.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-11

Downloads
677 (#43,864)

6 months
49 (#108,298)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jesper Ahlin Marceta
No Longer In Academia

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ideal vs. Non-ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map.Laura Valentini - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (9):654–664.
Two kinds of respect.Stephen Darwall - 1977 - Ethics 88 (1):36-49.
Ideal and nonideal theory.A. John Simmons - 2010 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 38 (1):5-36.
Responsible conduct of research.Adil E. Shamoo - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by David B. Resnik.
Does “Ought” Imply “Feasible”?Nicholas Southwood - 2016 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 44 (1):7-45.

View all 19 references / Add more references