Social Philosophy Today 22:219-230 (2006)
This paper is a critical discussion of Simon Blackburn’s recent work on lust. Blackburn develops a view on which lust is decent only when part of a pure mutuality in sex, and is best left alone—we ought not tamper with its “freedom of flow.” I argue that this treatment, which I believe reflects commonly held views, fails in several ways. First, it does not square with the fact that we pursue lust as a good in itself. Second, pure mutuality is hard to come by and almost impossible to recognize, so Blackburn’s account is more restrictive than it may seem. Third, on such a view, masturbation is morally sanctioned only insofar as it mimics real sex; this doesn’t seem right. Finally, such a perspective fits ill with some recent research on the biology of lust in women
|Keywords||lust sexual desire|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Seeking Desire: Reflections on Blackburn's Lust.Patricia Marino - 2007 - Social Philosophy Today 22:219-230.
Sex Hormones and Sexual Desire.James Giles - 2008 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 38 (1):45–66.
Social Constructionism and Sexual Desire.James Giles - 2006 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 36 (3):225–238.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads131 ( #34,348 of 2,143,905 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #280,613 of 2,143,905 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.