Social Philosophy Today 22:219-230 (2006)

Authors
Patricia Marino
University of Waterloo
Abstract
This paper is a critical discussion of Simon Blackburn’s recent work on lust. Blackburn develops a view on which lust is decent only when part of a pure mutuality in sex, and is best left alone—we ought not tamper with its “freedom of flow.” I argue that this treatment, which I believe reflects commonly held views, fails in several ways. First, it does not square with the fact that we pursue lust as a good in itself. Second, pure mutuality is hard to come by and almost impossible to recognize, so Blackburn’s account is more restrictive than it may seem. Third, on such a view, masturbation is morally sanctioned only insofar as it mimics real sex; this doesn’t seem right. Finally, such a perspective fits ill with some recent research on the biology of lust in women
Keywords lust  sexual desire
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2007
ISBN(s) 1543-4044
DOI 10.5840/socphiltoday20062210
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Ethics of Sexual Objectification: Autonomy and Consent.Patricia Marino - 2008 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 51 (4):345 – 364.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
598 ( #10,018 of 2,419,602 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #28,587 of 2,419,602 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes