Sign Systems Studies 38 (1/4):349-376 (2010)

Abstract
Biological mimicry can be considered as having a double-layered structure: there is a layer of ecological relations between species and there is a layer of semiotic relations of the sign. The present article demonstrates the limitations of triadic models and typologies of mimicry, as well as their lack of correspondence to mimicry as it actually occurs in nature. It is argued that more dynamical semiotic tools are needed to describe mimicry in a theoretically coherent way that would at the same time allow comparative approach to various mimicry cases. For this a five-stage model of analysis is proposed, which incorporates classical mimicry theory, Jakob von Uexküll’s Umwelt-theory, as well as semiotic and communication analysis. This research model can be expressed in the form of five questions: 1) What is the formal structure of mimicry system? 2) What are the perceptual and effectual correspondences between the participants of mimicry? 3) What are the characteristics of resemblances? 4) How is the mimicry system regulated in ontogenetic and evolutionary processes? 5) How is the mimicry system related to human cultural processes? As a practical example of this semiotic methodology, brood parasitism between the common cuckoo Cuculus canorus and his frequent host species is examined
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  Language and Literature  Semiotics
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1406-4243
DOI 10.5840/signsystems2010381/432
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,408
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Study of Instinct.N. Tinbergen - 1954 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 5 (17):72-76.
Ecosemiotics and the Semiotics of Nature.Winfried Nöth - 2001 - Sign Systems Studies 29 (1):81-81.
Semiotic Interpretations of Biological Mimicry.Timo Maran - 2007 - Semiotica 2007 (167):223-248.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Mimicry.Timo Maran - 2001 - Sign Systems Studies 29 (1):325-338.
The Geometry of Defection.Lou Marinoff - 2001 - Social Philosophy Today 17:69-90.
On the Zoosemiotics of Health and Disease.Aleksei Turovski - 2002 - Sign Systems Studies 30 (1):213-218.
Raphael Meldola and the Nineteenth-Century Neo-Darwinians.Anthony S. Travis - 2010 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 41 (1):143 - 172.
Mimicry: Its Ubiquity, Importance, and Functionality.Tanya L. Chartrand & Amy N. Dalton - 2009 - In Ezequiel Morsella, John A. Bargh & Peter M. Gollwitzer (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Human Action. Oxford University Press. pp. 458--483.
Science, Ecological Validity and Experimentation.Siu L. Chow - 1987 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 17 (2):181–194.
Semiotic Pollution.Roland Posner - 2000 - Sign Systems Studies 28:290-307.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-04-04

Total views
23 ( #456,649 of 2,420,816 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #351,362 of 2,420,816 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes