Schopenhauer on the Content of Compassion
Noûs (forthcoming)
Abstract
On the traditional reading, Schopenhauer claims that compassion is the recognition of deep metaphysical unity. In this paper, I defend and develop the traditional reading. I begin by addressing three recent criticisms of the reading from Sandra Shapshay: that it fails to accommodate Schopenhauer's restriction to sentient beings, that it cannot explain his moral ranking of egoism over malice, and that Schopenhauer requires some level of distinction to remain in compassion. Against Shapshay, I argue that Schopenhauer does not restrict compassion to sentient beings and that a more metaphysically refined version of the traditional reading can accommodate both Schopenhauer's moral ranking of characters and allow for some level of distinction in compassion. I then turn to four further questions for the traditional reading: what the relation is between the feeling of compassionate pain and the recognition of metaphysical unity, how cognitions mediate compassion, whether compassion is limited to the present, and how the feeling of compassion relates to Schopenhauer's fundamental moral principle. I conclude by explaining how, in a reductive vein, the traditional reading can also allow for compassion to have normative content.Author's Profile
DOI
10.1111/nous.12330
My notes
Similar books and articles
On Compassion: The Good beyond Values.Topi Heikkerö - 2017 - Dialogue and Universalism 27 (4):189-201.
Pain, pity, and motivation: Spinoza, Hume, and Schopenhauer.Peter Nilsson - 2014 - Schopenhauer Jahrbuch 95:29-50.
Reconstructing Schopenhauer’s Ethics: Hope, Compassion, and Animal Welfare.Sandra Shapshay - 2019 - New York, NY: Oup Usa.
Willingly Disinterested: Altruism in Schopenhauer’s Ethics.Michel-Antoine Xhignesse - 2013 - In Margit Ruffing, Claudio La Rocca, Alfredo Ferrarin & Stefano Bacin (eds.), Kant Und Die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des Xi. Kant-Kongresses 2010. De Gruyter. pp. 639-650.
Schopenhauer Redux: A Contemporary Rereading of Schopenhauer's Theory of Compassion.Brendan Terrence Leier - 2002 - Dissertation, University of Alberta (Canada)
La extensión de la comunidad moral en Schopenhauer: la moral de la compasión y el sufrimiento de los animales.Encarnación Ruiz Callejón - 2007 - Convivium: revista de filosofía 20:145-172.
Da compaixão à inocência: Nietzsche e Schopenhauer em torno da questão do egoísmo.Jelson Roberto de Oliveira - 2015 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 60 (1):167-190.
Schopenhauer's Critique of Kant's Foundation for Morals.Mark Lehman Koontz - 1993 - Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania
Compassion and professional care: exploring the domain.Margreet van der Cingel - 2009 - Nursing Philosophy 10 (2):124-136.
Metaphysical ethics reconsidered: Schopenhauer, compassion and world religions.Lenart Skof - 2006 - Schopenhauer Jahrbuch 87:101-117.
Schopenhauer and Non-Cognitivist Moral Realism.Colin Marshall - 2017 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 55 (2):293-316.
Active compassion in Schopenhauer's view on animals.Monica Libell - 1998 - Schopenhauer Jahrbuch 79:113-125.
Schopenhauer's Compassion and Nietzsche's Pity.David E. Cartwright - 1988 - Schopenhauer Jahrbuch 69:557-567.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-02-04
Downloads
628 (#14,896)
6 months
115 (#6,584)
2020-02-04
Downloads
628 (#14,896)
6 months
115 (#6,584)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Virtue and the Problem of Egoism in Schopenhauer's Moral Philosophy.Patrick Hassan - forthcoming - In Schopenhauer's Moral Philosophy. Routledge.
Schopenhauer's Titus Argument.Colin Marshall - forthcoming - In Patrick Hassan (ed.), Schopenhauer's Moral Philosophy. Routledge.
References found in this work
A puzzle about belief.Saul A. Kripke - 1979 - In A. Margalit (ed.), Meaning and Use. Reidel. pp. 239--83.
What the body commands: the imperative theory of pain.Colin Klein - 2015 - Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
An Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals.David Hume & Tom L. Beauchamp - 1998 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 190 (2):230-231.
Is empathy necessary for morality.Jesse J. Prinz - 2011 - In Amy Coplan & Peter Goldie (eds.), Empathy: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 211--229.