Snipers, Stalkers, and Nibblers: Online Auction Business Ethics [Book Review]

Journal of Business Ethics 46 (2):163 - 173 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Spirited disagreement exists among online auction participants over the ethics of sniping: delaying one's bid until the closing seconds of an online auction. Through analysis of the structural features of online auctions and by deploying Rawls's (1955) distinction between justifying an action under a practice and justifying the practice itself, I argue that: (i) the disagreement is better conceived as one over the ethics of online auction hosting (and therefore, over business ethics) than over the ethics of online auction participation; (ii) so conceived, the argument against sniping is nonetheless implausible; and (iii) the disagreement remains interesting not on the merits, but for the curious fact that it is bidders who complain about sniping.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,075

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

18 (#834,465)

6 months
5 (#643,111)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Two concepts of rules.John Rawls - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (1):3-32.

Add more references