Three contextual dimensions of information on social media: lessons learned from the COVID-19 infodemic

Ethics and Information Technology 23:79–86 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has been accompanied on social media by an explosion of information disorders such as inaccurate, misleading and irrelevant information. Countermeasures adopted thus far to curb these informational disorders have had limited success because these did not account for the diversity of informational contexts on social media, focusing instead almost exclusively on curating the factual content of user’s posts. However, content-focused measures do not address the primary causes of the infodemic itself, namely the user’s need to post content as a way of making sense of the situation and for gathering reactions of consensus from friends. This paper describes three types of informational context—weak epistemic, strong normative and strong emotional—which have not yet been taken into account by current measures to curb down the informational disorders. I show how these contexts are related to the infodemic and I propose measures for dealing with them for future global crisis situations.

Similar books and articles

The Information Medium.Orlin Vakarelov - 2012 - Philosophy and Technology 25 (1):47-65.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-27

Downloads
127 (#100,393)

6 months
57 (#23,035)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lavinia Marin
Delft University of Technology

References found in this work

Fake News and Partisan Epistemology.Regina Rini - 2017 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 27 (S2):43-64.
Stop Talking about Fake News!Joshua Habgood-Coote - 2019 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 62 (9-10):1033-1065.
Do artifacts have politics?Langdon Winner - 1980 - Daedalus 109 (1):121--136.

View all 11 references / Add more references