Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 12 (2):241-255 (2002)
Metaphor was based on similarity. During their history the Arabs adopted different logical systems in their scientific investigations. They shifted from Aristotle's logic accepted by the philosophers to that of the theologians and jurisconsults, and later again back to Aristotle's logic. In all these logical systems the definition of metaphor was dependent on the ever changing meaning of “similarity”. The seemingly unchanging definition of metaphor implies different interpretations in different ages parallel to the changing logical background.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Abduction and Metaphor: An Inquiry Into Common Cognitive Mechanism. [REVIEW]Cihua Xu & Hengwei Li - 2011 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (3):480-491.
Metaphor and the Logicians From Aristotle to Cajetan.E. J. Ashworth - 2007 - Vivarium 45 (s 2-3):311-327.
The Creation of Similarity: A Discussion of Metaphor in Light of Tversky's Theory of Similarity.Eva Feder Kittay - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:394 - 405.
Metaphor in the Mind: The Cognition of Metaphor.Elisabeth Camp - 2006 - Philosophy Compass 1 (2):154-170.
Saying and Seeing-As: The Linguistic Uses and Cognitive Effects of Metaphor.Elisabeth Maura Camp - 2003 - Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
Drama as Life: The Significance of Goffman's Changing Use of the Theatrical Metaphor.Phil Manning - 1991 - Sociological Theory 9 (1):70-86.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #257,345 of 2,164,554 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #347,971 of 2,164,554 )
How can I increase my downloads?