Human Studies 44 (3):453-471 (2021)
AbstractThe relationship between memory and history, which has preoccupied historiography and the philosophy of history since the middle of the nineteenth century, took a particular course in France at the end of the millennium. The forms this relationship took in this particular context have been the subject of heated debate around whether the reconstruction of the past should bear the sign of a moral imperative or, on the contrary, it should be kept away from any moral conditioning. To address this question and underline its particular relevance to the present, I will revisit a significant debate, based around Paul Ricoeur’s interpretation of the duty of memory developed in his book Memory, History, Forgetting. I will do this by means of a three-step approach. First, a short introduction will provide several guidelines for understanding the issues at stake in the debate in which Ricoeur was caught and explanations regarding the significance of the main notions around which the discussions took place, i.e., the duty and work of memory. Second, I will identify how historical debates, political decisions and civic concerns about the past gradually coagulated into two different “camps” in France during the 1980s and 1990s, i.e., the advocates of memory against those of history, foreshadowing the emergence of a historiographical crisis, the stakes of which I will analyse in detail. Finally, I will show how Ricoeur’s solution to this debate, i.e., an incomplete dialectic between the duty and the work of memory, developed on the horizon of justice, continues to have relevance for the present, being an innovative form of “defatalizing” the past.
Similar books and articles
Ricoeur and Foucault: Between Ontology and Critique.Patrick Gamez - 2013 - Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies 4 (2):90-107.
Hermeneutical crisis as rethinking the humanities: the question of the trace – traces of the past, cortical traces.Paul Marinescu - 2014 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 75 (2):142-151.
Collective Identity and Collective Memory in the Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur.David J. Leichter - 2012 - Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies 3 (1):114-131.
Of the Memory of the Past: Philosophy of History in Spiritual Crisis in the early Patočka and Ricoeur.Michael Funk Deckard - 2017 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 9 (2):560-583.
The second empire revisited. A study in French historiography. By Stuart L. Campbell. [REVIEW]M. Ch M. Ch - 1979 - History and Theory 18 (1):137.
False Memories and Reproductive Imagination: Ricoeur’s Phenomenology of Memory.Man-To Tang - 2015 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 7 (1):29-51.
Autonomy and its vulnerability: Ricoeur’s view on justice as a contribution to care ethics.Theo L. Hettema - 2014 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 17 (4):493-498.
A hermeneutical sketch of memory and the immemorial.Jon Utoft Nielsen - 2011 - Continental Philosophy Review 44 (4):401-416.
Europe in Front of its Colonial Past. The Question of Historiography.Anna Milioni - 2021 - Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies 12 (1):90-105.
Ricoeur on Moral Religion: A Hermeneutics of Ethical Life.James Carter - 2014 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Wittgenstein a Ricoeur. La visión de aspectos y la mirada historiográfica.Rafael Balza García - 2004 - Revista de Filosofía 22 (48):43-71.
De Wittgenstein a Ricoeur. La visión de aspectos y la mirada historiográfica.Rafael Balza García - 2004 - Revista de Filosofía (Venezuela) 48 (3):43-71.
Towards a Monumental Phenomenology: Paul Ricoeur and the Politics of Memory.James Ambury - 2006 - Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy 16 (1-2):105-120.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.