Revue Roumaine de Philosophie 62 (1):65-80 (2018)
AbstractThis article brings forth a new perspective concerning the relation between stupidity and thinking by proposing to conceptualise the state of non-thinking in two different ways, situated at the opposite ends of the spectrum of thinking. Two conceptualisations of stupidity are discussed, one critical which follows a French line of continental thinkers, and the other one which will be called educational or ascetic, following the work of Agamben. The critical approach is conceptualised in terms of seriality of thinking, or thinking captured by an apparatus, whereas the ascetic-educational approach is discussed by tracing the links between studying and stupidity. Both accounts assume that stupidity as non-thinking is a condition for thinking, either placed before thinking emerges or as an after-thought. However, the political implications concerning the role of philosophy in the public realm are divergent: for the critical approach, the task of the philosopher is to criticise the world, whereas for the ascetic approach, the task is to work on one’s own self and hope that the world will be changed through thinking. The wider aim of this article is to contribute to the debate concerning the public role of the intellectual starting from the assumption that there is a duty to think publicly and then clarifying what this duty entails in relation to the self and the others.
Similar books and articles
What Is Called Thinking?: When Deleuze Walks Along Heideggerian Paths.Benoît Dillet - 2013 - Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 7 (2):250-274.
Caveman Logic: The Persistence of Primitive Thinking in a Modern World.Hank Davis - 2009 - Prometheus Books.
Re/Thinking Critical Thinking: The Seductions of Everyday Life.Kal Alston - 2001 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 20 (1):27-40.
Critical Thinking in the Schools: Why Doesn't Much Happen?Ian Wright - 2002 - Informal Logic 22 (2).
Epistemic Responsibility and Critical Thinking.Anand Jayprakash Vaidya - 2013 - Metaphilosophy 44 (4):533-556.
The Pros and Cons of Identifying Critical Thinking with System 2 Processing.Jean-François Bonnefon - 2018 - Topoi 37 (1):113-119.
Integrating Critical Thinking into Daily Life.Steve Cady - 2004 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 23 (3):33-36.
Some Thoughts on Thinking and Teaching Styles.Alan Schwerin - 1996 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 16 (1):48-54.
Nabokov, Sartre and the Triumph of Stupidity.De Mesel Benjamin - 2014 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 76 (1):31-57.
Questions about Critical Thinking: A Survey of Relevant Research.Lori Richter - 2011 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 26 (2):37-43.
Critical Thinking: Reflection and Perspective Part II.Robert Ennis - 2011 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 26 (2):5-19.
Making sense in education: Deleuze on thinking against common sense.Itay Snir - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (3):299-311.
Body Thinking, Story Thinking, Religion.Wu Kuang-Ming - 2013 - Open Journal of Philosophy 3 (4):479.
Why Critical Thinking Should Be Combined With Written Composition.Donald L. Hatcher - 1999 - Informal Logic 19 (2).
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought.Hannah Arendt - 1961 - New York: Viking Press.
On Study: Giorgio Agamben and Educational Potentiality.Tyson E. Lewis - 2013 - New York: Routledge.