Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):375-394 (2009)

Scientific research is subject to a number of regulations which impose incidental (time, place), rather than substantive (type of research), restrictions on scientific research and the knowledge created through such research. In recent years, however, the premise that scientific research and knowledge should be free from substantive regulation has increasingly been called into question. Some have suggested that the law should be used as a tool to substantively restrict research which is dual-use in nature or which raises moral objections. There are, however, some problems with using law to restrict or prohibit certain types of scientific research, including (i) the inherent imprecision of law for regulating complex and rapidly evolving scientific research; (ii) the difficulties of enforcing legal restrictions on an activity that is international in scope; (iii) the limited predictability of the consequences of restricting specific branches of scientific research; (iv) inertia in the legislative process; and (v) the susceptibility of legislators and regulators to inappropriate factors and influence. Rather than using law to restrict scientific research, it may be more appropriate and effective to use a combination of non-traditional legal tools including norms, codes of conduct, restrictions on publication, and scientist-developed voluntary standards to regulate problematic scientific research.
Keywords Science regulation  Dual use  Substantive regulation  Research ethics  Code of conduct  Self-regulation  Voluntary standards
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-009-9130-9
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,232
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Code of Ethics for the Life Sciences.Nancy L. Jones - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (1):25-43.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Geoengineering as Collective Experimentation.Jack Stilgoe - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (3):851-869.
Dual-Use Decision Making: Relational and Positional Issues.Nicholas G. Evans - 2014 - Monash Bioethics Review 32 (3-4):268-283.
The Concept of Governance in Dual-Use Research.Alex Dubov - 2014 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 17 (3):447-457.
Scientific Self-Regulation—so Good, How Can It Fail?Patrick L. Taylor - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):395-406.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
54 ( #171,766 of 2,329,878 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #582,921 of 2,329,878 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes