The Rationality of Voting and Duties of Elected Officials

In Emily Crookston, David Killoren & Jonathan Trerise (eds.), Ethics in Politics: The Rights and Obligations of Individual Political Agents. New York: Routledge. pp. 239-253 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his recent article in Philosophy and Public Affairs, 'The Paradox of Voting and Ethics of Political Representation', Alexander A. Guerrero argues it is rational to vote because each voter should want candidates they support to have the strongest public mandate possible if elected to office, and because every vote contributes to that mandate. The present paper argues that two of Guerrero's premises require correction, and that when those premises are corrected several provocative but compelling conclusions follow about the rationality of voting and duties of elected officials: (A) Voting is typically rational for the members of a political party’s base; (B) Voting is often (but not always) irrational for “swing” voters (i.e. independent voters who are not affiliated with any political party, as well as “undecided” voters who are considering voting across party lines); and (C) Elected officials have a moral duty to respond to changing levels of popular support once in office, as indicated by properly monitored and corroborated public opinion polls of constituents, functioning more as delegates the lower their level of popular support. Finally, I suggest that the last of these conclusions has wide-ranging implications for political ethics. I illustrate these implications by focusing on the questions -- under debate in the 2016 US Presidential election cycle -- of whether a sitting President has a moral duty to nominate or not nominate a new Supreme Court justice during his or her final year in office, and similarly, whether US Senators have a moral duty to obstruct, or not obstruct, confirmation of the President’s eventual nominee.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Defense of Spoiler Voting.W. Scott Looney & Preston Werner - 2020 - Public Affairs Quarterly 34 (3):205-228.
Merely voting or voting Well? Democracy and the requirements of citizenship.Julia Maskivker - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
Voter Motivation.Adam Lovett - 2022 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 21 (3).
An Epistemic Case for Positive Voting Duties.Carline Klijnman - 2021 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 33 (1):74-101.
Sincerity and manipulation under approval voting.Ulle Endriss - 2013 - Theory and Decision 74 (3):335-355.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-10

Downloads
482 (#49,864)

6 months
165 (#22,428)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marcus Arvan
University of Tampa

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references