The Rationality of Voting and Duties of Elected Officials

In Emily Crookston, David Killoren & Jonathan Trerise (eds.), Ethics in Politics: The Rights and Obligations of Individual Political Agents. New York, USA: Routledge. pp. 239-253 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In his recent article in Philosophy and Public Affairs, 'The Paradox of Voting and Ethics of Political Representation', Alexander A. Guerrero argues it is rational to vote because each voter should want candidates they support to have the strongest public mandate possible if elected to office, and because every vote contributes to that mandate. The present paper argues that two of Guerrero's premises require correction, and that when those premises are corrected several provocative but compelling conclusions follow about the rationality of voting and duties of elected officials: (A) Voting is typically rational for the members of a political party’s base; (B) Voting is often (but not always) irrational for “swing” voters (i.e. independent voters who are not affiliated with any political party, as well as “undecided” voters who are considering voting across party lines); and (C) Elected officials have a moral duty to respond to changing levels of popular support once in office, as indicated by properly monitored and corroborated public opinion polls of constituents, functioning more as delegates the lower their level of popular support. Finally, I suggest that the last of these conclusions has wide-ranging implications for political ethics. I illustrate these implications by focusing on the questions -- under debate in the 2016 US Presidential election cycle -- of whether a sitting President has a moral duty to nominate or not nominate a new Supreme Court justice during his or her final year in office, and similarly, whether US Senators have a moral duty to obstruct, or not obstruct, confirmation of the President’s eventual nominee.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Compulsory voting: a critical perspective.Annabelle Lever - 2010 - British Journal of Political Science 40:897-915.
An argument for voting abstention.Nathan Hanna - 2009 - Public Affairs Quarterly 23 (4):279-286.
Against a Minimum Voting Age.Philip Cook - 2013 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (3):439-458.
The Manipulation of Voting Systems.David Hartvigsen - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 80 (1):13-21.
Compulsory Voting: For and Against.Jason Brennan & Lisa Hill - 2014 - Cambridge University Press.
The Ethics of Voting.Jason Brennan - 2011 - Princeton Univ Pr.
Ekonomska teorija demokratije i racionalni glasač.Ivan Mladenovic - 2009 - Filozofija I Društvo 20 (2):177-202.
People Do Not Have a Duty to Avoid Voting Badly: Reply to Brennan.Marcus Arvan - 2010 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 5 (1):1-6.
An indirect argument for strategic voting.Steven F. Geisz - 2006 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (4):433–444.


Added to PP

168 (#82,639)

6 months
24 (#64,145)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marcus Arvan
University of Tampa

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references