Verificationism in the tractatus?

Abstract

In the following, I will mean by ‘verificationism’ the doctrine according to which understanding a sentence entails that one knows how to verify it, i.e. how to determine its truth value. It is not the only possible meaning of ‘verificationism’, nor perhaps the most common. However, it is with reference to this sense of ‘verificationism’ that I am going to ask the question whether the Tractatus is committed to verificationism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Is Quine a Verificationist?Panu Raatikainen - 2003 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 41 (3):399-409.
Quine and verificationism.Dag Prawitz - 1994 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 37 (4):487 – 494.
Verificationism, realism and scepticism.Samir Okasha - 2001 - Erkenntnis 55 (3):371-385.
Peirce on meaning.Robert Almeder - 1979 - Synthese 41 (1):1 - 24.
Tom swift and his procedural grandmother.Jerry A. Fodor - 1978 - Cognition 6 (September):229-47.
Fitch's proof, verificationism, and the knower paradox.J. C. Beall - 2000 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (2):241 – 247.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
6 (#1,425,536)

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Diego Marconi
Università degli Studi di Torino

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references