What Is Living and What Is Dead in Attention?

Research in Phenomenology 39 (1):29-51 (2009)
Abstract
The goal of this article is to outline a triangular nexus between life, death, and attention. Not only does the act of attending animate or enliven consciousness in the passage from inactional and indeterminate potentiality to the actional determination of a noema but it also coincides with intentionality, itself the form of life proper to consciousness. Upon outlining the “enlivening” element in attention and the overlap between attention and psychic life as such, I will discuss its deadening aspects understood both in terms of the petrifaction resulting from a fixed, attentive, captivated gaze and, more positively, in terms of the potentiality of the inactional mode, in which consciousness lies dormant
Keywords intentionality   consciousness   death   attention   life
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/156916408X389622
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,678
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Buddhist Philosophy of the Dead.Fumihiko Sueki - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 6:259-265.
From Night to Day: Nihilism and the Living Dead.John Marmysz - 1996 - Film and Philosophy 3:138-143.
What We Owe the Dead.J. Jeremy Wisnewski - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (1):54-70.
Ex Post Facto: Peirce and the Living Signs of the Dead.Kieran Cashell - 2007 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (2):345-372.
Why Machines Can Neither Think nor Feel.Douglas C. Long - 1994 - In Dale W. Jamieson (ed.), Language, Mind and Art. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Abandon the Dead Donor Rule or Change the Definition of Death?Robert M. Veatch - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (3):261-276.
The Living and the Dead.Walter J. Ong - 1961 - Modern Schoolman 38 (2):169-170.
The Dead Donor Rule: Can It Withstand Critical Scrutiny?F. G. Miller, R. D. Truog & D. W. Brock - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (3):299-312.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-09-13

Total downloads

22 ( #227,509 of 2,170,078 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #345,514 of 2,170,078 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums