Pragmatics and Cognition 21 (2):304-328 (2013)

Fernando Martinez-Manrique
Universidad de Granada
Agustin Vicente
University of the Basque Country
Contextualist theorists have recently defended the views (a) that metaphor-processing can be treated on a par with other meaning changes, such as narrowing or transfer, and (b) that metaphorical contents enter into “what is said” by an utterance. We do not dispute claim (a) but consider that claim (b) is problematic. Contextualist theorists seem to leave in the hands of context the explanation about why it is that some meaning changes are directly processed, and thus plausibly form part of “what is said”, while some others are not. While granting the role of context in this respect, we contend that there are that there are elements that play an instrumental role in providing direct access to the metaphorical content, namely, the conventionality of the expressions and the salience of the concepts involved. We will start by criticizing Recanati’s and Relevance Theory’s accounts of metaphor. Then we examine the claims of Carston’s and Giora’s two-process accounts that set the stage for a revision of the main elements involved, namely, the properties of conventionality and salience. Finally we examine a number of representative examples, explaining why some cases involve a direct access to the metaphorical content and others require an intermediate non-figurative interpretation.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2013
DOI 10.1075/pc.21.2.03mar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Metaphors We Live By.George Lakoff & Mark Johnson - 1980 - University of Chicago Press.
Literal Meaning.François Recanati - 2002 - Cambridge University Press.
Logic and Conversation.H. Paul Grice - 1975 - In Maite Ezcurdia & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy. Broadview Press. pp. 47.
Metaphors We Live By.Max Black - 1980 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 40 (2):208-210.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Metaphor, Literal, Literalism.Stern Josef - 2006 - Mind and Language 21 (3):243–279.
The Life and Death of a Metaphor, or the Metaphysics of Metaphor.Josef Stern - 2007 - The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 3.
The Methodological Significance of Scientific Metaphor.Guichun Guo - 2007 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (3):437-453.
Metaphor and What is Said.Catherine Wearing - 2006 - Mind and Language 21 (3):310–332.
Zhuangzi and the Nature of Metaphor.Kim Chong Chong - 2006 - Philosophy East and West 56 (3):370-391.
Salience Reasoning.Gerald J. Postema - 2008 - Topoi 27 (1-2):41-55.
On the Meaning of Metaphor in Gadamer's Hermeneutics.Ben Vedder - 2002 - Research in Phenomenology 32 (1):196-209.


Added to PP index

Total views
1,538 ( #2,707 of 2,449,117 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
52 ( #12,791 of 2,449,117 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes