Res Publica 14 (3):177-192 (2008)

Abstract
Freedom of religious expression is to many a fundamental element of their identity. Yet the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights on the Islamic headscarf issue does not refer to autonomy and identity rights of the individual women claimants. The case law focuses on Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which provides a legal human right to freedom of religious expression. The way that provision is interpreted is critically contrasted here with the right to personal autonomy and identity now developed by that court in interpreting Article 8 which contains a right to respect one’s private life.
Keywords Autonomy  Identity  European Court of Human Rights  Religion  Islamic headscarves  Gender equality
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11158-008-9066-y
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,564
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?Susan Moller Okin (ed.) - 1999 - Princeton University Press.

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
58 ( #199,876 of 2,533,570 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #390,861 of 2,533,570 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes