Balancing Efficiency and the Protection of Research Participants: Canadian Allergy/Asthma Researchers’ Perspectives on the Ethics Review of Multi-Site Health Research

, &
Journal of Clinical Research and Bioethics 2 (5) (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.4172/2155-9627.1000104e

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reforming the ethical review system: balancing the rights and interests of research participants with the duty to facilitate good research.E. Cave & C. Nichols - 2007 - Clinical Ethics 2 (2):74-79.
Moving Toward Evidence-Based Human Participant Protection.Michael McDonald & Susan Cox - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):1-16.
Health service research: the square peg in human subjects protection regulations.L. S. Gittner, M. J. Roach, G. Kikano, S. Grey & N. V. Dawson - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (2):118-122.
Effective Streamlining of Ethics and Governance Processes: Fact or Fiction?Stuart Braverman & Rajinder Sidhu - 2011 - Research Ethics 7 (2):66-70.
Clinical Research Consultation: A Casebook.Marion Danis (ed.) - 2012 - Oxford University Press.
Strict Confidentiality: An Alternative to Pre’s “Limited Confidentiality” Doctrine. [REVIEW]John Lowman & Ted Palys - 2007 - Journal of Academic Ethics 5 (2-4):163-177.
The ESRC research ethics framework and research ethics review at UK universities: rebuilding the Tower of Babel REC by REC.D. L. H. Hunter - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (11):815-820.
Empirical research on research ethics.Joan E. Sieber - 2004 - Ethics and Behavior 14 (4):397 – 412.
Autonomy, the Right Not to Know, and the Right to Know Personal Research Results: What Rights Are There, and Who Should Decide about Exceptions?Gert Helgesson - 2014 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 42 (1):28-37.
The views of members of Local Research Ethics Committees, researchers and members of the public towards the roles and functions of LRECs.G. Kent - 1997 - Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (3):186-190.
Handling ethical, legal and social issues in birth cohort studies involving genetic research: responses from studies in six countries.Nola M. Ries, Jane LeGrandeur & Timothy Caulfield - 2010 - BMC Medical Ethics 11 (1):4.
Unequal protection for patient rights: The divide between university and health ethics committees. [REVIEW]Dr Martin Tolich & Kate Mary Baldwin - 2005 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2 (1):34-40.
Supererogation in clinical research.Deborah R. Barnbaum - 2008 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (3):343-349.
Health Research in Complex Emergencies: A Humanitarian Imperative. [REVIEW]John D. Pringle & Donald C. Cole - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):115-123.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-02

Downloads
15 (#889,556)

6 months
3 (#880,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references