COVID-19, Coronavirus, Wuhan Virus, or China Virus? Understanding How to “Do No Harm” When Naming an Infectious Disease

Frontiers in Psychology 11 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When labeling an infectious disease, officially sanctioned scientific names, e.g., “H1N1 virus,” are recommended over place-specific names, e.g., “Spanish flu.” This is due to concerns from policymakers and the WHO that the latter might lead to unintended stigmatization. However, with little empirical support for such negative consequences, authorities might be focusing on limited resources on an overstated issue. This paper empirically investigates the impact of naming against the current backdrop of the 2019–2020 pandemic. The first hypothesis posited that using place-specific names associated with China leads to greater levels of sinophobia, the negative stigmatization of Chinese individuals. The second hypothesis posited that using a scientific name leads to increased anxiety, risk aversion, beliefs about contagiousness of the virus, and beliefs about mortality rate. Results from two preregistered studies [N = 504; N = 412], conducted across three countries with the first study during the early outbreak and the second study at a later stage of the pandemic, found no evidence of any adverse effects of naming on sinophobia and strong support for the null hypothesis using Bayesian analyses. Moreover, analyses found no impact of naming on anxiety, risk aversion, beliefs about contagiousness of the virus, or beliefs about mortality rate, with mild to strong support for the null hypothesis across outcomes. Exploratory analyses also found no evidence for the effect of naming being moderated by political affiliation. In conclusion, results provide no evidence that virus naming impacted individual’s attitudes toward Chinese individuals or perceptions of the virus, with the majority of analyses finding strong support for the null hypothesis. Therefore, based on the current evidence, it appears that the importance given to naming infectious diseases might be inflated.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Covid 19 pandemic: Impact on masses and prevention knowhow. Namita, Chitra Singh & Vivek Kumar - 2020 - International Journal of Medical and Health Research 6 (9):6-9.
Being human in the time of Covid-19.Johann-Albrecht Meylahn - 2020 - HTS Theological Studies 76 (1).
Balancing autonomy and justice in the U.S. with a coronavirus outbreak.Ann Boyd & Brandi Davidson - 2020 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 30 (7):358-362.
We Must Be Able to Get Used to the Real.Jaco Barnard-Naudé - 2020 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 53 (3):217-224.
Invisible Enemies: Coronavirus and Other Hidden Threats.D. M. Shaw - 2020 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17 (4):531-534.
Relationships between Sri Lankan culture, diets and COVID-19 disease control.Omalpe Somanada - 2020 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 30 (4):143-147.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-22

Downloads
8 (#1,138,679)

6 months
4 (#320,252)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?