Degeneracy at Multiple Levels of Complexity

Biological Theory 5 (3):277-288 (2010)

Abstract
Degeneracy is a poorly understood process, essential to natural selection. In the 18th and 19th centuries, the concept of degeneracy was commandeered by the colonial imagination. A rigid understanding of species, race, and culture grew to dominate the normative thinking that persisted well into the burgeoning new industrial age. A 20th-century reconfiguration of the concept by George Gamow highlighted a form of intraorganismic variation that is still underexplored. Degeneracy exists in a population of variants where structurally different components perform a similar, but not necessarily identical, function with respect to context. The presence of degeneracy increases a system’s complexity and robustness against perturbations. The loss of a genetic component in biological systems, for example, can be compensated by redundant elements , or by degenerate elements . A historical survey of the use of the term “degeneracy” reveals how and why the processes it once designated, and the mechanisms it now represents, have largely escaped the purview of contemporary science. Despite confusion and general oversight, degeneracy has been characterized by select researchers at the molecular, genetic, and neuronal levels. The concept is a potent analytical tool to understand selection, variation, and transmission
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1162/biot_a_00041
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,599
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Extended Mind.Andy Clark & David J. Chalmers - 1998 - Analysis 58 (1):7-19.
Ontogeny and Phylogeny.Stephen Jay Gould - 1978 - Philosophy of Science 45 (4):652-653.
Cognitive Foundations of Natural History: Towards an Anthropology of Science.Scott Atran - 1991 - Journal of the History of Biology 24 (3):537-540.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Structural Powers and the Homeodynamic Unity of Organisms.Christopher J. Austin & Anna Marmodoro - 2017 - In William M. R. Simpson, Robert C. Koons & Nicholas J. Teh (eds.), Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives on Contemporary Science. Routledge. pp. 169-184.
A Biologically Informed Hylomorphism.Christopher J. Austin - 2017 - In William M. R. Simpson, Robert C. Koons & Nicholas J. Teh (eds.), Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives on Contemporary Science. Routledge. pp. 185-210.
Evo-Devo: A Science of Dispositions.Christopher Austin - 2017 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 7 (2):373-389.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Accidental Degeneracies and Symmetry Groups.Marcos Moshinsky - 1983 - Foundations of Physics 13 (1):73-82.
Kramers Degeneracy Without Eigenvectors.Bryan W. Roberts - 2012 - Physical Review A 86 (3):034103.
Philosophy of Chemistry and Limits of Complexity.Hrvoj Vančik - 2003 - Foundations of Chemistry 5 (3):237-247.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-01-24

Total views
15 ( #579,946 of 2,280,577 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #835,594 of 2,280,577 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature