Journal of Business Ethics 68 (2):143-151 (2006)

Authors
Lawrence Masek
Ohio Dominican University
Abstract
In a recent contribution to this journal, Patrick Tully criticizes my view that the doctrine of double effect does not prohibit a pharmaceutical company from selling a drug that has potentially fatal side-effects and that does not treat a life-threatening condition. Tully alleges my account is too permissive and makes the doctrine irrelevant to decisions about selling harmful products. In the following paper, I respond to Tully’s objections and show that he misinterprets my position and misstates some elements of the doctrine of double effect. I also show how the doctrine constrains some decisions about marketing drugs with potentially fatal side-effects.
Keywords consequentialism  foreseen effect  formal cooperation  intended effect  intention  intrinsic evil  material cooperation  natural law  principle of double effect  proportionality
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-006-9060-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,878
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Theory of Morality.Alan Donagan - 1977 - University of Chicago Press.
Business Ethics.Thomas M. Garrett - 1966 - New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
The Theory of Morality.Adina Schwartz - 1978 - Philosophical Review 87 (4):649.
Who is Entitled to Double Effect?Joseph Boyle - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):475-494.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Intentions, Motives and the Doctrine of Double Effect.Lawrence Masek - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (240):567-585.
The Contralife Argument and the Principle of Double Effect.Lawrence Masek - 2011 - National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 11 (1):83-97.
Four Versions of Double Effect.Donald B. Marquis - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):515-544.
Aristotle and Double Effect.Ezio Di Nucci - 2014 - Journal of Ancient Philosophy 8 (1):20.
A Double Dose of Double Effect.C. E. Kendall - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (3):204-205.
The Danger of Double Effect.P. A. Reed - 2012 - Christian Bioethics 18 (3):287-300.
The Double Life of Double Effect.Allison McIntyre - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (1):61-74.
Who is Entitled to Double Effect?Joseph Boyle - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):475-494.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
62 ( #167,659 of 2,439,021 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #434,623 of 2,439,021 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes