Friedman on suspended judgment

Synthese:1-18 (forthcoming)

Authors
Michal Masny
Princeton University
Abstract
In a recent series of papers, Jane Friedman argues that suspended judgment is a sui generis first-order attitude, with a question as its content. In this paper, I offer a critique of Friedman’s project. I begin by responding to her arguments against reductive higher-order propositional accounts of suspended judgment, and thus undercut the negative case for her own view. Further, I raise worries about the details of her positive account, and in particular about her claim that one suspends judgment about some matter if and only if one inquires into this matter. Subsequently, I use conclusions drawn from the preceding discussion to offer a tentative account: S suspends judgment about p iff S believes that she neither believes nor disbelieves that p, S neither believes nor disbelieves that p, and S intends to judge that p or not-p.
Keywords Jane Friedman  Suspension of judgment  Suspended judgment  Agnosticism  Question-directed attitude
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-018-01957-1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 49,128
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Aim of Belief.Ralph Wedgwood - 2002 - Philosophical Perspectives 16:267-97.
Suspended Judgment.Jane Friedman - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (2):165-181.
Why Suspend Judging?Jane Friedman - 2017 - Noûs 51 (2):302-326.

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Suspended Judgment.Jane Friedman - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (2):165-181.
Rational Agnosticism and Degrees of Belief.Jane Friedman - 2013 - Oxford Studies in Epistemology 4:57.
Why Suspend Judging?Jane Friedman - 2017 - Noûs 51 (2):302-326.
Kant's Modalities of Judgment.Jessica Leech - 2012 - European Journal of Philosophy 20 (2):260-284.
The Elusiveness of Arendtian Judgment.Bryan Garsten - 2007 - Social Research 74:1071-1108.
Judgment, Logos, and Knowledge in Plato's Theaetetus.Naly Thaler - 2016 - Philosophy Compass 11 (5):246-255.
The Elusiveness of Arendtian Judgment.Bryan Garsten - 2007 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 74 (4):1071-1108.
In Sensible Judgment.Max Deutscher - 2012 - Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie continentale 16 (1):203-225.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-11-03

Total views
87 ( #104,000 of 2,311,514 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #26,785 of 2,311,514 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature