Non‐defensible middle ground for experimental realism: Why we are justified to believe in colored quarks

Philosophy of Science 71 (1):36-60 (2004)
Abstract
Experimental realism aims at striking a middle ground between scientific realism and anti-realism, between the success of experimental physics it would explain and the realism about scientific theories it would supplant. This middle ground reinstates the engineering idea that belief in scientific entities is justified on purely experimental grounds, without any commitment to scientific theories and laws. This paper argues that there is no defensible middle ground to be staked out when it comes to justifying physicists' belief in colored quarks, and that experimental realism shifts, under analysis, into scientific realism.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/381412
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,224
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Did Perrin's Experiments Convert Poincare to Scientific Realism.Milena Ivanova - 2013 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 3 (1):1-19.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
194 ( #23,037 of 2,191,997 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #59,432 of 2,191,997 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature