Philosophy Today 54 (2):138-52 (2010)
AbstractHeidegger claims in Being and Time that Bergson fails to overcome traditional ontology because his concept of time is fundamentally Aristotelian. On the basis of this hasty dismissal, it is tempting to conclude that Heidegger was not terribly interested in Bergson or that he only wanted to prevent readers from confusing his view of time with Bergson’s. To the contrary, a survey of Heidegger’s early lectures and writings on the issue of time reveals a strong interest in Bergson and an acknowledgement of his importance as a pivotal thinker concerning time. In fact, Heidegger appropriates key aspects of Bergsonism, such as Bergson’s way of contrasting the measurement of time and its experiential origins, revealing that his ambivalence toward Bergson initially arises from concerns about his method and his concept of life rather than his understanding of time.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Inheritance, Originality and the Will: Bergson and Heidegger on Creation.Mark Sinclair - 2014 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 22 (5):655-675.
Similar books and articles
Phallocentrism in Bergson: Life and Matter.Rebecca Hill - 2008 - Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 2 (Suppl):123-136.
The “Concept of Time” and the “Being of the Clock”: Bergson, Einstein, Heidegger, and the Interrogation of the Temporality of Modernism. [REVIEW]David Scott - 2006 - Continental Philosophy Review 39 (2):183-213.
Wandering Among Shadows: The Discordance of Time in Levinas and Bergson.Robin Durie - 2010 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (4):371-392.
‘Quelque Romancier Hardi’: The Literary Bergsonist.Jesse Matz - 2011 - The European Legacy 16 (7):937 - 951.
Time and Free Will: An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness.Henri Bergson - 1913 - Dover Publications.
Revisiting the Concept of Time: Archaic Perplexity in Bergson and Heidegger. [REVIEW]James Gilbert-Walsh - 2010 - Human Studies 33 (2-3):173-190.