Hastings Center Report 46 (5):34-39 (2016)

Authors
Stuart Youngner
Case Western Reserve University
Abstract
While the bioethics literature demonstrates that the field has spent substantial time and thought over the last four decades on the goals, methods, and desired outcomes for service and training in bioethics, there has been less progress defining the nature and goals of bioethics research and scholarship. This gap makes it difficult both to describe the breadth and depth of these areas of bioethics and, importantly, to gauge their success. However, the gap also presents us with an opportunity to define this scope of work for ourselves and to help shape the broader conversation about the impact of academic research. Because of growing constraints on academic funding, researchers and scholars in many fields are being asked to demonstrate and also forecast the value and impact of their work. To do that, and also to satisfy ourselves that our work has meaningful effect, we must understand how our work can motivate change and how that change can be meaningfully measured. In a field as diverse as bioethics, the pathways to and metrics of change will likewise be diverse. It is therefore critical that any assessment of the impact of bioethics research and scholarship be informed by an understanding of the nature of the work, its goals, and how those goals can and ought to be furthered. In this paper, we propose a conceptual model that connects individual bioethics projects to the broader goals of scholarship, describing the translation of research and scholarly output into changes in thinking, practice, and policy. One of the key implications of the model is that impact in bioethics is generally the result of a collection of projects rather than of any single piece of research or scholarship. Our goal is to lay the groundwork for a thoroughgoing conversation about bioethics research and scholarship that will advance and shape the important conversation about their impact.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1002/hast.615
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,908
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Role of Empirical Research in Bioethics.Alexander A. Kon - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6-7):59-65.
Empirical Medical Ethics.T. Hope - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (3):219-220.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What Is Bioethics Worth?Mildred Z. Solomon - 2016 - Hastings Center Report 46 (5):44-46.
Telos Versus Praxis in Bioethics.Tod S. Chambers - 2016 - Hastings Center Report 46 (5):41-42.
Do We Count?Alexander M. Capron - 2016 - Hastings Center Report 46 (5):39-41.
Quality of Scholarship in Bioethics.Baruch A. Brody - 1990 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (2):161-178.
Disability: An Agenda for Bioethics.Mark G. Kuczewski - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (3):36-44.
On the Nature and Sociology of Bioethics.Mark Sheehan & Michael Dunn - 2013 - Health Care Analysis 21 (1):54-69.
Criteria for Authorship in Bioethics.David B. Resnik & Zubin Master - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (10):17 - 21.
Interdisciplinary Bioethics on the Crossroad of Research Methods.Eliane Azevêdo - 2007 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 17 (2):34-34.
The Impact of Pay-for-Performance Beyond Quality Markers-A Call for Bioethics Research.D. J. Satin - 2006 - Bioethics Examiner. University of Minnesota Center for Bioethics. Fall 10 (1).
Bioethics, Social Class, and the Sociological Imagination.Leigh Turner - 2005 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14 (4):374-378.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-09-21

Total views
21 ( #531,368 of 2,497,755 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #428,370 of 2,497,755 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes