Art, Sexual Selection, Group Selection (Critical Notice of Denis Dutton, The Art Instinct)

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (2):337-356 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The capacity to engage with art is a human universal present in all cultures and just about every individual human. This indicates that this capacity is evolved. In this Critical Notice of Denis Dutton's The Art Instinct, I discuss various evolutionary scenarios and their consequences. Dutton and I both reject the "spandrel" approach that originates from the work of Gould and Lewontin. Dutton proposes, following work of Geoffrey Miller, that art is sexually selected--that art-production is a sign of a fit genome in males. I argue that while assortative mating may well have had a role in the evolution of "the art instinct", group selection is a better explanation. I also take issue with Dutton's "cluster concept" approach to defining art, and argue that it is a universal and essential characteristic of art that it is appreciated both for what it expresses and for the way that it expresses. It thus requires a reflexive capacity that is not operative in the appreciation of sport spectacles and pornography.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-19

Downloads
544 (#18,405)

6 months
22 (#52,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mohan Matthen
University of Toronto, Mississauga

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references