Canadian Journal of Philosophy 33 (4):575-598 (2003)
AbstractIn his Art and Knowledge, the distinguished Canadian philosopher of art, James O. Young, takes on the daunting task of defending his opening claim that ‘every item properly classified as a work of art can contribute to human knowledge’. His assertion is a general one, intended to apply to any and every prospective artwork, not merely to sub-genres like the moral novel or the ‘Shock-Headed Peter’ school of didactic bedtime terror-fest. Thus, according to Young, works such as The Well-Tempered Clavier and Vermeer’s Officer and Laughing Girl do not qualify as art unless they can provide knowledge about topics that are important to us as human beings. A work does not become artworthy by inspiring us to meditate, ruminate, or reflect unless the work also leads us to true beliefs that are, in some sense, justified. Furthermore, it’s not enough for a work to provide knowledge about, say, abstruse issues in eighteenth-century counterpoint or the cult of painterly flatness; to count as art, a work must, in some way, supply answers to questions that are important to us as human beings living in the world. Young also argues that artworks have their own method of conveying knowledge. Hence, he buttresses his cognitive definition of art with an epistemology of art.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Critical Notice of James O. Young, Art and Knowledge.Carl Matheson & Evan Kirchhoff - 2003 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 33 (4):575-598.
Critical Notice: James O. Young, Art and Knowledge. London: Routledge 2001. Pp. 180.Carl Matheson & Evan Kirchhoff - 2003 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 33 (4):575-598.
Critical Notice of Theodore Sider, Four Dimensionalism.Matthew Davidson - 2004 - Philosophical Books 45 (1):17-33.
Critical Notice of Robert Audi, The Good in the Right.Anthony Skelton - 2007 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (2):305-325.
Critical Notice of Larry S. Temkin Inequality.Dennis Mckerlie - 1995 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 25 (4):623-636.
Saying Too Little and Saying Too Much. Critical Notice of ‘Lying, Misleading and What is Said’, by Jennifer Saul.Andreas Stokke - 2013 - Disputatio 5 (35):81-91.
An Evolutionary Account of Science: A Response to Rosenberg's Critical Notice. [REVIEW]David L. Hull - 1992 - Biology and Philosophy 7 (2):229-236.
Critical Notice of Michael Dummett's Frege: Philosophy of Mathematics.Crispin Wright - 2001 - Philosophical Books 1995:89-102.
Critical Notice of Paul Thomson's The Structure of Biological Theories.John D. Collier - 1992 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 22 (2):287-298.
Immanence, Difference, and the Overcoming of Metaphysics: A Book Encounter [Critical Notice] with Leonard Lawlor’s Early Twentieth-Century Continental Philosophy (Indiana University Press, 2012). [REVIEW]Donald A. Landes - 2013 - PhaenEx 8 (2):360-374.