Disentangling the Effects of Arousal and Valence on Memory for Intrinsic Details

Emotion Review 1 (2):118-119 (2009)

Kensinger (2009) and Mather (2007) both argue that intrinsic features of emotional items are remembered better than intrinsic features of non-emotional items. However, Kensinger attributes these effects to negative valence whereas Mather attributes them to arousal. In this paper, we note several reasons why arousal may be the driving factor even when a study reveals more detailed memory for negative items than for positive items. We also reanalyze previous data (Mather & Nesmith, 2008) to show that although both arousal and negative valence were correlated with memory accuracy, enhanced memory accuracy was accounted for by arousal rather than valence
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1754073908100435
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,599
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
75 ( #115,048 of 2,280,600 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
45 ( #20,051 of 2,280,600 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature