Euphemisms for terrorism: How dangerous are they?

Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 7 (2):225-237 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines how euphemisms for terrorism have pervaded the media and the English language for the past few decades. On the whole, a euphemism refers to an agreeable expression that has replaced a more unpleasant one, even though the latter is more accurate and truthful. This analysis attempts to answer the following question: do euphemisms for terrorism help the international community? A major conclusion is that euphemisms are dangerous because they constitute language manipulation and separate the message from the meaning. By calling terrorists ‘radicals’, ‘insurgents’, or ‘rebels’, Western media and governments operate on the principle of semantic deviance and deflect attention away from reality. This could cause citizens to lower their guard in times where they should feel in danger.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Euphemisms and hypocrisy in corporate philanthropy.Anders la Cour & Joakim Kromann - 2011 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 20 (3):267-279.
Questions regarding a war on terrorism.Claudia Card - 2003 - Hypatia 18 (1):164 - 169.
Terrorism: A Philosophical Enquiry.Anne Schwenkenbecher - 2012 - Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Terrorism for humanity: inquiries in political philosophy.Ted Honderich - 2003 - Sterling, Va.: Pluto Press. Edited by Ted Honderich.
Three Prejudices Against Terrorism.Shawn Kaplan - 2009 - Critical Studies on Terrorism 2 (2):181-199.
On the concept of terrorism.Willem Schinkel - 2009 - Contemporary Political Theory 8 (2):176-198.
‘Terrorism’ as a Method of Terrorism.Tomis Kapitan - 2004 - In Georg Meggle, Andreas Kemmerling & Mark Textor (eds.), Ethics of Terrorism & Counter-Terrorism. De Gruyter. pp. 21-38.
Terrorism: The Philosophical Issues.Igor Primoratz (ed.) - 2004 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Defining Terrorism.Scott C. Lowe - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:253-256.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-12-14

Downloads
32 (#431,931)

6 months
6 (#203,358)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references