Fundamentality and Extradimensional Final Value

Journal of Philosophy of Life 5 (3):19-32 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that life’s meaning is not only a distinct, gradational final value of individual lives, but also an “extradimensional” final value: the realization of meaning in life brings final value along an additional evaluative dimension, much as the realization of depth in solids or width in plane geometric figures brings magnitude along an additional spatial dimension. I go on to consider the extent to which Metz’s (2013) fundamentality theory respects the principle that life’s meaning is an extradimensional final value, and consequently suggest that the theory may stand in need of further refinement and supplementation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,517

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reconsidering Meaning in Life: A Philosophical Dialogue with Thaddeus Metz.Masahiro Morioka (ed.) - 2015 - Journal of Philosophy of Life, Waseda University.
What good is meaning in life?Christopher Woodard - 2017 - De Ethica 4 (3):67-79.
Meaning without Ego.Christopher Ketcham - 2015 - Journal of Philosophy of Life 5 (3):112-133.
Metz’s Quest for the Holy Grail.James Tartaglia - 2015 - Journal of Philosophy of Life 5 (3):90-111.
Contributions Toward a Naturalist Theory of Life's Meaning.Thaddeus Metz - 1998 - Dialogue and Universalism 8 (11):25-32.
Agreement and Sympathy: On Metz’s Meaning in Life.Sho Yamaguchi - 2015 - Journal of Philosophy of Life 5 (3): 66-89.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-11-01

Downloads
120 (#150,254)

6 months
10 (#396,964)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Matheson
Carleton University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references