Ratio Juris 23 (4):505-539 (2010)
An increasing number of Italian scholars are beginning to share the idea that the conceptual basis of legal positivism (LP) is wrong, particularly in the field of Public Law. According to a group of theories called “neoconstitutionalism,” constitutionalism is to be understood not only as a principle based on the need to impose legal limits to political power, but also as an aggregation of values capable of continually remodelling legal relationships, positioning itself as a “pervasive” point of reference for legal experience. A recent essay by Professor Antonio Baldassarre, President Emeritus of the Constitutional Italian Court, about the “misery of legal positivism” is a good expression of this view. In this article, the ideas outlined by Baldassarre are examined and criticized. The paper also tries to defend a version of legal positivism, which has both a conceptual and prescriptive meaning, relating to decisions made on the basis of rules. This view is based on the two correlated concepts of primary formalism and secondary formalism of “competence and procedure.”
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics.Joseph Raz - 1994 - Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Legal Positivism? What Are You Talking About? ('De Quel Positivisme Parlez-Vous?').Francois Chevrette & Hugo Cyr - unknown
The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism.Robert P. George (ed.) - 1996 - Oxford University Press.
The Place of Legal Positivism in Contemporary Constitutional States.G. Pino - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (5):513-536.
On Relationships Between the Logic of Law, Legal Positivism and Semiotics of Law.Vadim Verenich - 2011 - Sign Systems Studies 39 (2-4):145-195.
Between Natural Law and Legal Positivism: Dworkin and Hegel on Legal Theory.Thom Brooks - 2007 - Georgia State University Law Review 23 (3):513-60.
The Anarchist Official: A Problem for Legal Positivism.Kenneth M. Ehrenberg - 2011 - Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 36:89-112.
Inclusive Legal Positivism, Legal Interpretation, and Value-Judgments.Vittorio Villa - 2009 - Ratio Juris 22 (1):110-127.
Analytical Jurisprudence and the Concept of Commercial Law.John Linarelli - 2009 - Penn State Law Review 114 (1):119-215.
In Defense of Legal Positivism: Law Without Trimmings.Matthew H. Kramer - 1999 - Oxford University Press.
Added to index2010-11-15
Total downloads12 ( #369,609 of 2,152,626 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #399,611 of 2,152,626 )
How can I increase my downloads?