Bioethics 31 (4):313-320 (2017)
AbstractAt some point in the future – perhaps within the next few decades – it will be possible for foetuses to develop completely outside the womb. Ectogenesis, as this technology is called, raises substantial issues for the abortion debate. One such issue is that it will become possible for a woman to have an abortion, in the sense of having the foetus removed from her body, but for the foetus to be kept alive. We argue that while there is a right to an abortion, there are reasons to doubt that there is a right to the death of the foetus. Our strategy in this essay is to consider and reject three arguments in favour of this latter right. The first claims that women have a right not to be biological mothers, the second that women have a right to genetic privacy, and the third that a foetus is one's property. Furthermore, we argue that it follows from rejecting the third claim that genetic parents also lack a right to the destruction of cryopreserved embryos used for in vitro fertilization. The conclusion that a woman possesses no right to the death of the foetus builds upon the claims that other pro-choice advocates, such as Judith Jarvis Thomson, have made.
Similar books and articles
Doubts About a Classic Defence of Abortion.Jo Difford - 2011 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 17 (1):122-129.
Women, Ectogenesis and Ethical Theory.Leslie Cannold - 1995 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):55-64.
Legal Aspects of Regulation of Abortion in the Context of Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights.Edita Gruodytė - 2012 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 19 (2):739-752.
“Throwing Baby Out with the Bath Water#x201D;: Some Reflections on the Evolution of Reproductive Technology}.Julie Wallbank - 1999 - Res Publica 5 (1):45-65.
The Moral Status of Abortion in Islam: A Comparative Study of Muslim and Western Normative Ethics Regarding the Act of Terminating the Life of A Foetus.Paweł Bernat - 2015 - International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research 3 (4):273-278.
Dancing on the Head of a Pin? Foetal Life and the European Convention.Barbara Hewson - 2005 - Feminist Legal Studies 13 (3):363-375.
Two Stalemates in the Philosophical Debate About Abortion and Why They Cannot Be Resolved Using Analogical Arguments.Chris Kaposy - 2012 - Bioethics 26 (2):84-92.
Killing, Letting Die, and the Morality of Abortion.Anton Tupa - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (1):1-26.
Future People, Involuntary Medical Treatment in Pregnancy and the Duty of Easy Rescue.Julian Savulescu - 2007 - Utilitas 19 (1):1-20.
De zichtbare foetus. Echoscopie, endoscopie en de visualisering van de foetus.Jftm van Dijck - 1999 - Wijsgerig Perspectief 39:137-142.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Neonatal Incubator or Artificial Womb? Distinguishing Ectogestation and Ectogenesis Using the Metaphysics of Pregnancy.Elselijn Kingma & Suki Finn - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (4):354-363.
Ectogenesis, Abortion and a Right to the Death of the Fetus.Joona Räsänen - 2017 - Bioethics 31 (9):697-702.
Gestaticide: Killing the Subject of the Artificial Womb.Daniel Rodger, Nicholas Colgrove & Bruce Philip Blackshaw - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics (12).
Ectogestation and the Problem of Abortion.Christopher M. Stratman - 2020 - Philosophy and Technology 34 (4):683-700.
Abortion and Ectogenesis: Moral Compromise.William Simkulet - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (2):93-98.