Racial Integration and the Problem of Relational Devaluation

Dialogue 62 (1):3-45 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article argues that blacks should reject integration on self-protective and solidarity grounds. It distinguishes two aspects of black devaluation: a ‘stigmatization’ aspect that has to do with the fact that blacks are subject to various forms of discrimination, and an aesthetic aspect (‘phenotypic devaluation’) that concerns the aesthetic devaluation of characteristically black phenotypic traits. It identifies four self-worth harms that integration may inflict, and suggests that these may outweigh the benefits of integration. Further, it argues that, while the integrating process may reduce stigmatization, there is less reason to think that it can do the same for phenotypic devaluation.

Other Versions

original Matthew, Dale C. (2023) "Racial Integration and Devaluation: Reply to Stanley, Valls, Basevich, Merry, and Sundstrom". Dialogue 62(1):3-45

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,105

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-21

Downloads
53 (#392,542)

6 months
9 (#433,081)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Matthew
University College, Cork

Citations of this work

Integration and Reaction.Ronald R. Sundstrom - 2023 - Dialogue 62 (1):77-83.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
What is the point of equality.Elizabeth Anderson - 1999 - Ethics 109 (2):287-337.
Two kinds of respect.Stephen Darwall - 1977 - Ethics 88 (1):36-49.
Dark Ghettos: Injustice, Dissent, and Reform.Tommie Shelby - 2016 - Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

View all 29 references / Add more references