In O. Bazaluk (ed.), The image of the man of the future: Whom and How to educate in younger generation, part 3 (2013)
Authors | |
Abstract |
The philosophy of education, being an integrative and anthropologic knowledge, has to perform a prognostic and axiological function, forming a perspective of a world-view genesis of personality and provide theoretical and methodological background for the innovation processes in the education. The forming of harmonious, intellectually developed, creative, conscientious, responsible, purposeful and healthy human personality – these are all the main tasks of the educational system. There are many approaches in performing of such strategic task. One of them, starting from the urgency of a problem of sexual indifference of a modern school education, is presented in a single-sex format of education and is based upon individual approach to the education and upbringing of each and every pupil, taking into account the gender peculiarities of development. In this article we analyze the influence of a single-sex format of education on the process of forming of pupils’ personality, taking into account the age periodization of individual ontogenesis. We developed cognitive, motivational and psychological peculiarities of boys and girls during the periods of childhood and youth. Theoretical comprehension of a need in taking into consideration of the gender characteristics of pupils within the educational process – has been proved on practices, implementing the gender-orientated separate education in schools that demonstrates very positive results. There was made a conclusion about the fact, that the system of gender-orientated separated education has a strong potential of enhancing quality of a pedagogical process and helps to form the personalities of those who study. This can be achieved by taking into account the psychological, physiological and pedagogical peculiarities of boys and girls, by following in the process of educational activities the principals of egalitarianism, nature conformity, self-actualization, creative initiative, democracy and humanism, by creating of an environment, that will be free from impact of gender stereotypes and prejudice.
|
Keywords | philosophy of education single-sex education gender stereotypes individual approach |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Buy the book |
Find it on Amazon.com
|
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Раздельное образование как средство учета гендерных характеристик в процессе формирования планетарно-космической личности учащихся средних школ.Tetiana Matusevych - 2013 - In Олег Базалук (ed.), Образ человека будущего: Кого и Как воспитывать в подрастающих поколениях.
No Boy Left Behind? Single-Sex Education and the Essentialist Myth of Masculinity.David S. Cohen - manuscript
Knowledge, Gender, and Schooling: The Feminist Educational Thought of Jane Roland Martin.D. G. Mulcahy - 2002 - Bergin & Garvey.
A Curriculum in Moral Education for Adolescents.Ralph L. Mosher & Paul R. Sullivan - 1976 - Journal of Moral Education 5 (2):159-172.
Conflicting Philosophies of School Sex Education.Michael J. Reiss - 1995 - Journal of Moral Education 24 (4):371-382.
Kant's Philosophy of Education: Between Relational and Systemic Approaches.Ana Marta González - 2011 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (3):433-454.
Primary Goods, Capabilities, and the Millennium Development Target for Gender Equity in Education (2002).Harry Brighouse - unknown
Environmental Values Education: An Exploration of its Role in the School Curriculum.William Scott & Chris Oulton - 1998 - Journal of Moral Education 27 (2):209-224.
Positive Philosophy, Innovative Method and Present Education System.Desh Raj Sirswal - 2015 - Intellection : A Bi-Annual Interdisciplinary Research Journal, (II):1-13.
System and Complex Approach in Management of Modern Education.Raisa B. Kvesko & Svetlana B. Kvesko - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 37:161-167.
Education for Sexism: A Theoretical Analysis of the Sex/Gender Bias in Education.Bronwyn Davies - 1989 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 21 (1):1–19.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-10-08
Total views
685 ( #7,610 of 2,403,593 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #43,426 of 2,403,593 )
2013-10-08
Total views
685 ( #7,610 of 2,403,593 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #43,426 of 2,403,593 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads