Science – logic – philosophy. An old problem resuscitated

Logic and Logical Philosophy 21 (2):107-126 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that Hume’s and Carnap’s criticism of philosophy (meta-physic) contains a rational core and that this core can be much more sharply formulated as soon as a procedural theory of concepts is applied. Also, a possible solution to the problem can be suggested in a much more definite manner

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Simple Concepts.Pavel Materna - 2013 - Acta Analytica 28 (3):295-319.
The notion of problem, intuitionism and partiality.Pavel Materna - 2008 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 17 (4):287-303.
Can concepts be defined in terms of sets?Marie Duží & Pavel Materna - 2010 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 19 (3):195-242.
Concepts and recipes.Pavel Materna - 2009 - Acta Analytica 24 (1):69-90.
Conceptual and Derivation Systems.Jiří Raclavský & Petr Kuchyňka - 2011 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 20 (1-2):159-174.
Constructions.Pavel Tichy - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (4):514-534.
The Paradox of Inference and the Non-Triviality of Analytic Information.Marie Duží - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (5):473 - 510.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
46 (#336,891)

6 months
16 (#149,874)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations