Leibnizian soft reduction of extrinsic denominations and relations

Synthese 139 (1):143-164 (2004)
Leibniz, it seems, wishes to reduce statements involving relations or extrinsic denominations to ones solely in terms of individual accidents or, respectively, intrinsic denominations. His reasons for this appear to be that relations are merely mental things (since they cannot be individual accidents) and that extrinsic denominations do not represent substances as they are on their own. Three interpretations of Leibniz''s reductionism may be distinguished: First, he allowed only monadic predicates in reducing statements (hard reductionism); second, he allowed also `implicitly relational predicates'' such as `loves somebody'' (soft reductionism); third, he allowed also `explicitly relational predicates'' such as `loves Helen'' (nonreductionism). Hard reductionism is problematic with respect to Leibniz''s doctrines of universal expression and incompossibility (among other things). Nonreductionism, in turn, faces insurmountable problems with Leibniz''s doctrine of self-sufficiency and internal identification of substances, as well as with that of individual accidents. The remaining option, soft reductionism, standing between the other two interpretations, arguably avoids at least some of their problems.
Keywords Leibniz  Relations  Properties  Substance
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/B:SYNT.0000021310.53938.ad
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Leibniz's Theory of Universal Expression Explicated.Ari Maunu - 2008 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38 (2):247-267.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Leibniz's Theory of Universal Expression Explicated.Ari Maunu - 2008 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38 (2):247-267.
Do Relations Require Underlying Intrinsic Properties? A Physical Argument for a Metaphysics of Relations.Michael Esfeld - 2003 - Metaphysica: International Journal for Ontology and Metaphysics 4 (1):5-25.
A Distinction in Value: Intrinsic and for its Own Sake.Wlodek Rabinowicz & Toni Rønnow-Rasmussen - 2000 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100 (1):33–51.
Leibniz on Purely Extrinsic Denominations (Review).Gary L. Cesarz - 2004 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (4):494-495.
Leibniz on Purely Extrinsic Denominations.Dennis Plaisted - 2002 - University of Rochester Press.
Disentangling Leibniz's Views on Relations and Extrinsic Denominations.Anja Jauernig - 2010 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (2):pp. 171-205.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

126 ( #37,587 of 2,158,232 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

21 ( #17,646 of 2,158,232 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums