Replies [Book Review]


Authors
Tim Maudlin
New York University
Abstract
Professor Field’s generous comments raise both certain substantial points and opportunities for clarification. I will respond in the order the points appear.
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy  Philosophy of Mind
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0031-8205
DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2006.tb00559.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,304
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

'Many Minds' Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics: Replies to Replies.Michael Lockwood - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (3):445-461.
Replies to My Critics.Samir Okasha - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (3):425-431.
Replies. [REVIEW]Herman Cappelen & Ernie Lepore - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (2):469–492.
Replies to Eleven Essays.W. V. Quine - 1981 - Philosophical Topics 12 (1):227-243.
Replies to Eriksson, Martin and Moore.Mitchell S. Green - 2010 - Acta Analytica 25 (1):105-117.
The Problem of Natural Evil II: Hybrid Replies.Luke Gelinas - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (3):560-574.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
50 ( #186,284 of 2,330,106 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #584,494 of 2,330,106 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes