So, What Do You Think About Luhmann’s Ontology?

Constructivist Foundations 10 (2):211-212 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Ontology, Reality and Construction in Niklas Luhmann’s Theory” by Krzysztof C. Matuszek. Upshot: Matuszek’s article is about the way Luhmann reshaped but failed to eliminate ontology. I try to contribute with some thoughts about how Luhmann’s theory is in fact based on certain ontological assumptions

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Reality of Ontologies in Luhmann’s Work.H. Cadenas - 2015 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (2):210-211.
Searching and Finding Ontology.A. Scholl - 2015 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (2):218-221.
“Believe it or not!” - It’s About the Truth in Science.H. Egner - 2015 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (2):221-222.
Society as Constructed Ontology?F. Grote - 2015 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (2):217-218.
Ontology, Reality and Construction in Niklas Luhmann’s Theory.K. C. Matuszek - 2015 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (2):203-210.
Niklas Luhmann.Jakob Arnoldi - 2001 - Theory, Culture and Society 18 (1):1-13.
On Reading and Critiquing Luhmann.B. Scott - 2012 - Constructivist Foundations 8 (1):30-32.
Luhmann Conservative, Luhmann Progressive.Reiner Grundmann - 1990 - European University Institute.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-03-16

Downloads
14 (#961,492)

6 months
2 (#1,263,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references