Aristóteles Contra o Bem dos Economistas

Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 77 (1):217-234 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Despite its origins within moral philosophy, economists think their science has nothing to do with the good. They appeal to some kind of Hume’s guillotine that divides the descriptive and the normative. With that in hand, they affirm the solely descriptive aspect of their discipline. I argue this is not the case. Economists have, as they need to, an all encompassing notion of the good. I suggest going back to Aristotelian arguments to show the shortcomings of this good of economists. Aristotle is helpful because of his analysis of chrematistics and the real function of money. Hence, the loosely utilitarian good of the economists is confronted with a robust sense of the good and the human form. The capability approach is the first to identify these weak points on economic theory and to propose a sort of Aristotelian comeback. However, I claim the capabilities approach itself doesn’t follow the Aristotelian arguments used to attack economists to its necessary conclusion. Therefore, I suggest that the recent advances in neo-Aristotelian ethical naturalism can be used to reformulate economics by dispossessing economists of their sumo bonnun.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is the public really irrational about economics?Arjo Klamer - 2008 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 20 (3):327-331.
Aristotelian ethics in Marx?Alexandre Lima - 2014 - Trans/Form/Ação 37 (2):11-30.
Economic Imperialism.Kurt W. Rothschild - 2008 - Analyse & Kritik 30 (2):723-733.
Equality of Authority as the Aristotelian Common Good.Mark LeBar - 2020 - Journal of Value Inquiry 55 (3):399-416.
Human Needs, Consumption, and Social Policy.Ayşe Buğra & Gürol Irzik - 1999 - Economics and Philosophy 15 (2):187.
Making sense of economists' positive-normative distinction.David Colander & Huei-Chun Su - 2015 - Journal of Economic Methodology 22 (2):157-170.
What economists say (and don't say) about politics.Anthony Woodlief - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 14 (2-3):271-298.
Eminent Economists: Their Life Philosophies.Michael Szenberg (ed.) - 1991 - Cambridge University Press.
A Case for In-Kind Transfers.Steven Kelman - 1986 - Economics and Philosophy 2 (1):55.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-04-30

Downloads
2 (#1,629,482)

6 months
1 (#1,028,709)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references