Are Probabilism and Special Relativity Compatible?

Philosophy of Science 55 (4):640-645 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Are probabilism and special relativity compatible? Dieks argues that they are. But the possible universe he specifies, designed to exemplify both probabilism and special relativity, either incorporates a universal “now”, or amounts to a many world universe, or fails to have any one definite overall Minkowskian-type space-time structure. Probabilism and special relativity appear to be incompatible after all. What is at issue is not whether “the flow of time” can be reconciled with special relativity, but rather whether explicitly probabilistic versions of quantum theory should be rejected because of incompatibility with special relativity.

Similar books and articles

Are probabilism and special relativity compatible?Nicholas Maxwell - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (4):640-645.
On relativity theory and openness of the future.Nicholas Maxwell - 1993 - Philosophy of Science 60 (2):341-348.
Special relativity and the flow of time.Dennis Dieks - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (3):456-460.
On relativity theory and openness of the future.Howard Stein - 1991 - Philosophy of Science 58 (2):147-167.
Tunneling Confronts Special Relativity.Günter Nimtz - 2011 - Foundations of Physics 41 (7):1193-1199.
Special relativity.Albert Shadowitz - 1968 - Philadelphia,: Saunders Co..
Time in Classical and Relativistic Physics.Gordon Belot - 2013 - In Adrian Bardon & Heather Dyke (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Time. Chichester, UK: Blackwell. pp. 185-200.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
201 (#96,220)

6 months
76 (#56,750)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nicholas Maxwell
University College London

Citations of this work

On relativity theory and openness of the future.Howard Stein - 1991 - Philosophy of Science 58 (2):147-167.
Real dispositions in the physical world.Ian J. Thompson - 1988 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (1):67-79.
On becoming, relativity, and nonseparability.Mauro Dorato - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (4):585-604.
Would Superluminal Influences Violate the Principle of Relativity?Kent Peacock - 2014 - Lato Sensu: Revue de la Société de Philosophie des Sciences 1 (1):49-62.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Quantum propensiton theory: A testable resolution of the wave/particle dilemma.Nicholas Maxwell - 1988 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (1):1-50.
Can there be necessary connections between successive events?Nicholas Maxwell - 1968 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (1):1-25.
Are probabilism and special relativity compatible?Nicholas Maxwell - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (4):640-645.

View all 10 references / Add more references