The Dalhousie Review 79 (3):301-317 (1999)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
In this paper I demolish three influential arguments - moral, metaphysical and epistemological - against value realism. We have good reasons to believe, and no good reasons not to believe, that value-features, value-facts, really do exist in the world.
|
Keywords | Value realism Metaphysical objections Moral objections Epistemological objections |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
What’s Wrong With Science? Towards a People’s Rational Science of Delight and Compassion, Second Edition.Nicholas Maxwell - 2009 - London: Pentire Press.
Similar books and articles
The Neglected Controversy Over Metaphysical Realism.Mary Kate McGowan - 2002 - Philosophy 77 (1):5-21.
Consequentialism, Metaphysical Realism and the Argument From Cluelessness.Dale Dorsey - 2012 - Philosophical Quarterly 62 (246):48-70.
Must Metaethical Realism Make a Semantic Claim?Guy Kahane - 2013 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (2):148-178.
Shafer-Landau and Moral Realism.Christian Miller - 2006 - Social Theory and Practice 32 (2):311-331.
Impartial Reasons, Moral Demands.Brian McElwee - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (4):457-466.
La réalité objective dans les Premières objections aux Méditations métaphysiques : Ockham contre Descartes.Laurence Renault - forthcoming - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale.
Deepening the Controversy Over Metaphysical Realism.Sophie R. Allen - 2002 - Philosophy 77 (4):519-541.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2011-03-17
Total views
421 ( #22,723 of 2,499,399 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #56,003 of 2,499,399 )
2011-03-17
Total views
421 ( #22,723 of 2,499,399 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #56,003 of 2,499,399 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads