Can there be necessary connections between successive events?

Abstract
THE aim of this paper is to refute Hume's contention that there cannot be logically necessary connections between successive events. I intend to establish, in other words, not 'Logically necessary connections do exist between successive events', but instead the rather more modest proposition: 'It may be, it is possible, as far as we can ever know for certain, that logically necessary connections do exist between successive events.' Towards the end of the paper I shall say something about the implications of rejecting Hume's contention.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 1969
DOI 10.1093/bjps/19.1.1
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Historical Explanation, Folk Psychology, and Narrative.Mark Bevir - 2000 - Philosophical Explorations 3 (2):152 – 168.
Humean Humility.Aisling Crean - 2010 - Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy (Special Issue edited by Helen Beebee and Markus Schrenk) 13.
Proof and Demonstration: Hume's Account of the Causal Relation.Andrew Ward - 2008 - International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (1):23-37.
God, Causation and Occasionalism.William F. Vallicella - 1999 - Religious Studies 35 (1):3-18.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

479 ( #3,915 of 2,169,652 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

7 ( #43,041 of 2,169,652 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums