British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (1):1-25 (1968)
THE aim of this paper is to refute Hume's contention that there cannot be logically necessary connections between successive events. I intend to establish, in other words, not 'Logically necessary connections do exist between successive events', but instead the rather more modest proposition: 'It may be, it is possible, as far as we can ever know for certain, that logically necessary connections do exist between successive events.' Towards the end of the paper I shall say something about the implications of rejecting Hume's contention.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Three Philosophical Problems About Consciousness and Their Possible Resolution.Maxwell Nicholas - 2011 - Open Journal of Philosophy 1 (1):1.
Reply to Comments on Science and the Pursuit of Wisdom.Nicholas Maxwell - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (4):667-690.
Similar books and articles
Historical Explanation, Folk Psychology, and Narrative.Mark Bevir - 2000 - Philosophical Explorations 3 (2):152 – 168.
Beginningless Past, Endless Future, and the Actual Infinite.Wes Morriston - 2010 - Faith and Philosophy 27 (4):439-450.
Humean Humility.Aisling Crean - 2010 - Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy (Special Issue edited by Helen Beebee and Markus Schrenk) 13.
Energetic, Informational, and Triggering Causes.Władysław Krajewski - 1997 - Erkenntnis 47 (2):193-202.
Applying Forward Models to Sequence Learning: A Connectionist Implementation.Axel Cleeremans - unknown
Proof and Demonstration: Hume's Account of the Causal Relation.Andrew Ward - 2008 - International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (1):23-37.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads479 ( #3,915 of 2,169,652 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #43,041 of 2,169,652 )
How can I increase my downloads?