Induction, Simplicity and Scientific Progress

Scientia 114 (14):629-653 (1979)
In a recent work, Popper claims to have solved the problem of induction. In this paper I argue that Popper fails both to solve the problem, and to formulate the problem properly. I argue, however, that there are aspects of Popper's approach which, when strengthened and developed, do provide a solution to at least an important part of the problem of induction, along somewhat Popperian lines. This proposed solution requires, and leads to, a new theory of the role of simplicity in science, which may have helpful implications for science itself, thus actually stimulating scientific progress.
Keywords Karl Popper  Induction  Simplicity
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,727
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
An Aspect of the Logic of Discovery.Scott A. Kleiner - 1983 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 21 (4):513-536.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Popper on Induction.Andrew J. Swann - 1988 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (3):367-373.
Popper's Paradoxical Pursuit of Natural Philosophy.Nicholas Maxwell - 2016 - In J. Shearmur & G. Stokes (eds.), Cambridge Companion to Popper. Cambridge University Press. pp. 170-207.
A Note on Popper's Equation of Simplicity with Falsifiability.Peter Turney - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (1):105-109.
Karl Raimund Popper.Nicholas Maxwell - 2002 - In Leemon McHenry, P. Dematteis & P. Fosl (eds.), British Philosophers, 1800-2000. Bruccoli Clark Layman. pp. 176-194.
Łukasiewicz and Popper on Induction.Jan Woleński & Joseph Agassi - 2010 - History and Philosophy of Logic 31 (4):381-388.

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

Added to index


Total downloads

1 ( #842,419 of 2,146,279 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #386,504 of 2,146,279 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums