Induction, Simplicity and Scientific Progress

Scientia 114 (14):629-653 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In a recent work, Popper claims to have solved the problem of induction. In this paper I argue that Popper fails both to solve the problem, and to formulate the problem properly. I argue, however, that there are aspects of Popper's approach which, when strengthened and developed, do provide a solution to at least an important part of the problem of induction, along somewhat Popperian lines. This proposed solution requires, and leads to, a new theory of the role of simplicity in science, which may have helpful implications for science itself, thus actually stimulating scientific progress.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,813

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Popper on induction.Andrew J. Swann - 1988 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (3):367-373.
Popper's paradoxical pursuit of natural philosophy.Nicholas Maxwell - 2016 - In J. Shearmur & G. Stokes (eds.), Cambridge Companion to Popper. Cambridge University Press. pp. 170-207.
A note on Popper's equation of simplicity with falsifiability.Peter Turney - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (1):105-109.
Karl Raimund Popper.Nicholas Maxwell - 2002 - In Leemon McHenry, P. Dematteis & P. Fosl (eds.), British Philosophers, 1800-2000. Bruccoli Clark Layman. pp. 176-194.
Łukasiewicz and Popper on Induction.Jan Woleński & Joseph Agassi - 2010 - History and Philosophy of Logic 31 (4):381-388.


Added to PP

5 (#1,557,157)

6 months
1 (#1,507,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nicholas Maxwell
University College London

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references