Is Science Neurotic?

Metaphilosophy 33 (3):259-299 (2002)

Authors
Nicholas Maxwell
University College London
Abstract
Neurosis can be interpreted as a methodological condition which any aim-pursuing entity can suffer from. If such an entity pursues a problematic aim B, represents to itself that it is pursuing a different aim C, and as a result fails to solve the problems associated with B which, if solved, would lead to the pursuit of aim A, then the entity may be said to be "rationalistically neurotic". Natural science is neurotic in this sense in so far as a basic aim of science is represented to be to improve knowledge of factual truth as such (aim C), when actually the aim of science is to improve knowledge of explanatory truth (aim B). Science does not suffer too much from this neurosis, but philosophy of science does. Much more serious is the rationalistic neurosis of the social sciences, and of academic inquiry more generally. Freeing social science and academic inquiry from neurosis would have far reaching, beneficial, intellectual, institutional and cultural consequences.
Keywords Neurosis of science  Rationalistic neurosis  Irrationality of science
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2005
DOI 10.1111/1467-9973.00228
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

The Significance of Free Will.Robert Kane - 1996 - Oxford University Press USA.
The Scientific Image.Michael Friedman - 1982 - Journal of Philosophy 79 (5):274-283.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.David Bohm - 1962 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (57):377-379.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Unification and Revolution: A Paradigm for Paradigms.Nicholas Maxwell - 2014 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 45 (1):133-149.
In Defence of Constructive Empiricism: Maxwell’s Master Argument and Aberrant Theories.F. A. Muller - 2008 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 39 (1):131-156.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Darwinian Roots of Human Neurosis.Daniel R. Wilson - 1994 - Acta Biotheoretica 42 (1):49-62.
Articulating the Aims of Science.Nicholas Maxwell - 1977 - Nature 265 (January 6):2.
“Do We Need a Scientific Revolution.Nicholas Maxwell - 2008 - Journal for Biological Physics and Chemistry 8 (3):95-105.
Gr Nbaum's Freud.Donald Levy - 1988 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 31 (2):193 – 215.
Is Science Neurotic?Nicholas Maxwell - 2002 - Imperial College Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
491 ( #9,860 of 2,285,629 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #36,532 of 2,285,629 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature