Imperial College Press (2004)
Is Science Neurotic? sets out to show that science suffers from a damaging but rarely noticed methodological disease — “rationalistic neurosis.” Assumptions concerning metaphysics, human value and politics, implicit in the aims of science, are repressed, and the malaise has spread to affect the whole academic enterprise, with the potential for extraordinarily damaging long-term consequences. The book begins with a discussion of the aims and methods of natural science, and moves on to discuss social science, philosophy, education, psychoanalytic theory and academic inquiry as a whole. It makes an original and compelling contribution to the current debate between those for and those against science, arguing that science would be of greater human value if it were more rigorous — we suffer not from too much scientific rationality, but too little. The author discusses the need for a revolution in the aims of science and academic inquiry in general and, in a lively and accessible style, spells out a thesis with profound importance for the long-term future of humanity.
|Keywords||metaphysics aims of inquiry scientific method philosophy of science physics social science psychoanalysis values neurosis rationality natural science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$7.13 used (91% off) $63.90 new (20% off) $76.55 direct from Amazon (4% off) Amazon page|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Science, Practice and Mythology: A Definition and Examination of the Implications of Scientism in Medicine. [REVIEW]Michael Loughlin, George Lewith & Torkel Falkenberg - 2013 - Health Care Analysis 21 (2):130-145.
Unification and Revolution: A Paradigm for Paradigms.Nicholas Maxwell - 2014 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 45 (1):133-149.
Reply to Comments on Science and the Pursuit of Wisdom.Nicholas Maxwell - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (4):667-690.
Muller's Critique of the Argument for Aim-Oriented Empiricism.Nicholas Maxwell - 2009 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 40 (1):103-114.
Similar books and articles
Nicholas Maxwell:Is Science Neurotic?:Is Science Neurotic?Joseph Agassi - 2008 - Philosophy of Science 75 (4):477-479.
Do We Need a Scientific Revolution?Nicholas Maxwell - 2008 - Journal for Biological Physics and Chemistry 8 (3):95-105.
The Need for a Revolution in the Philosophy of Science.Nicholas Maxwell - 2002 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 33 (2):381-408.
Science Under Attack.Nicholas Maxwell - 2005 - The Philosopher’s Magazine (31, 3rd Quarter 2005):37-41.
The Urgent Need for an Academic Revolution: The Rational Pursuit of Wisdom.Nicholas Maxwell - 2010 - In Charles Tandy (ed.), Death And Anti-Death, Volume 7: Nine Hundred Years After St. Anselm (1033-1109. Ria University Press.
A Revolution for Science and the Humanities: From Knowledge to Wisdom.Nicholas Maxwell - 2005 - Dialogue and Universalism 15 (1-2):29-57.
What's Wrong with Science?: Towards a People's Rational Science of Delight and Compassion.Nicholas Maxwell - 1976 - Bran's Head Books.
What’s Wrong With Aim-Oriented Empiricism?Nicholas Maxwell - 2015 - Acta Baltica Historiae Et Philosophiae Scientiarum 3 (2):5-31.
How Simple is It for Science to Acquire Wisdom According to its Choicest Aims?Giridhari Lal Pandit - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (4):649-666.
Nicholas Maxwell • is Science Neurotic? • London: Imperial College Press, 2004 • Hardback Price $48/£29 • Isbn 1860945007. [REVIEW]Slobodan Perovic - 2007 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (2):361-363.
Added to index2011-01-17
Total downloads115 ( #41,979 of 2,158,877 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #354,157 of 2,158,877 )
How can I increase my downloads?