The Philosopher’s Magazine (31, 3rd Quarter 2005):37-41 (2005)
Science has been under attack ever since William Blake and Romantic movement. In our time, criticisms of modern science have led to Alan Sokal's spoof, and the so-called science wars. Both sides missed the point. Science deserves to be criticized for seriously misrepresenting its highly problematic aims, which have metaphysical, value and political assumptions associated with them. Instead of repressing these problematic aims, science ought rather to make them explicit, so that they can be critically assessed and, we may hope, improved.
|Keywords||Science under attack Romantic criticisms Science wars Problematic aims of science Science, metaphysics, values and politics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science From Bunk.Massimo Pigliucci - 2010 - University of Chicago Press.
Do We Need a Scientific Revolution?Nicholas Maxwell - 2008 - Journal for Biological Physics and Chemistry 8 (3):95-105.
Economic Values in the Configuration of Science.Wenceslao J. González - 2008 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 96 (1):85-112.
Can Science Be Objective? Longino's Science as Social Knowledge. [REVIEW]Sharon L. Crasnow - 1993 - Hypatia 8 (3):194-201.
Science Under Siege?: Interest Groups and the Science Wars.Leon E. Trachtman - 2000 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Book Review:Science and Values: The Aims of Science and Their Role in Scientific Debate Larry Laudan. [REVIEW]Patrick Suppes - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (3):449-.
Against the Politics of Postmodern Philosophy of Science.Dimitri Ginev - 2005 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (2):191 – 208.
Added to index2011-03-18
Total downloads297 ( #10,573 of 2,177,981 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,027 of 2,177,981 )
How can I increase my downloads?