Review of Steven Pinker's Enlightenment NOW [Book Review]

Metascience 27 (2):347-350 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Steven Pinker's "Enlightenment NOW" is in many ways a terrific book, from which I have learnt much. But it is also deeply flawed. Science and reason are at the heart of the book, but the conceptions that Steven Pinker defends are damagingly irrational. And these defective conceptions of science and reason, as a result of being associated with the Enlightenment Programme for the past two or three centuries, have been responsible, in part, for the genesis of the global problems we now suffer from, and our current inability to deal with them properly. There is not a glimmering of an awareness of any of this in Pinker’s book. This flaw in Enlightenment NOW is serious indeed.

Similar books and articles

Can The World Learn Wisdom?Nicholas Maxwell - 2015 - Philosophy Now (108):32-35.
Does Science Provide Us with the Methodological Key to Wisdom?Nicholas Maxwell - 2012 - Philosophia, First Part of 'Arguing for Wisdom in the University' 40 (4):664-673.
Progress and environmental sustainability.John M. Gowdy - 1994 - Environmental Ethics 16 (1):41-55.
La ilustración escocesa y la idea de progreso.José Montoya Sáenz - 1992 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 1 (9):623-634.
Ilustración y progreso en David Hume.Amán Rosales Rodríguez - 2005 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 38 (1):117-141.
How Humanity Might Avoid Devastation.Nicholas Maxwell - 2015 - Ethical Record 120 (1):18-23.
Pinker and progress.Ronald Aronson - 2013 - History and Theory 52 (2):246-264.
Eseje Davida Hume’a a Oświecenie.Justyna Van den Abbeel - 2017 - Studia Z Historii Filozofii 7 (4):183-202.


Added to PP

320 (#41,227)

6 months
30 (#54,784)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nicholas Maxwell
University College London

Citations of this work

Add more citations