Habeas Corpus as Jus Cogens in International Law

Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (3):249-265 (2010)
Abstract
For hundreds of years procedural rights such as habeas corpus have been regarded as fundamental in the Anglo-American system of jurisprudence. In contemporary international law, fundamental norms are called jus cogens. Jus cogens norms are rights or rules that can not be derogated even by treaty. In the list that is often given, jus cogens norms include norms against aggression, apartheid, slavery, and genocide. All of the members of this list are substantive rights. In this paper I will argue that some procedural rights, crucial for the fair functioning of criminal proceedings, such as habeas corpus, should also have the status of jus cogens norms. I will begin by explaining what it means for a right to have jus cogens status. And I will follow this with a defense of having procedural rights like habeas corpus added to the list of jus cogens norms. I will then rehearse some of the debates about the jus cogens status of procedural rights in the European Commission on Human Rights. At the end of this paper, I will look at the attempts to deal with the abuses at Guantanamo by the American Commission on Human Rights, and by the US and Australian courts, as a way to understand why there needs to be a stronger support for habeas corpus than is today provided by regional courts.
Keywords Habeas corpus   Jus cogens  Equity  Procedural rights  Guantanamo
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11572-010-9101-x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,157
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Basic Rights.Henry Shue - 1983 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 173 (3):342-342.
War Crimes and Just War.Larry May - 2008 - Journal of Military Ethics 7 (4):317-319.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Legitimating Role of Consent in International Law.Matthew Lister - 2011 - Chicago Journal of International Law 11 (2).
The Incoherence of Walzer's Just War Theory.Graham Parsons - 2012 - Social Theory and Practice 38 (4):663-88.
The Just War Tradition and its Modern Legacy: Jus Ad Bellum and Jus in Bello.D. Boucher - 2012 - European Journal of Political Theory 11 (2):92-111.
Habeas Corpus.Marc Froment Meurice - 2009 - Derrida Today 2 (1):66-83.
Moral Responsibilities and the Conflicting Demands of Jus Post Bellum.Mark Evans - 2009 - Ethics and International Affairs 23 (2):147-164.
Religion, Religions, and Human Rights.Louis Henkin - 1998 - Journal of Religious Ethics 26 (2):229-239.
Order and Affray: Defensive Privileges in Warfare.Toby Handfield & Patrick Emerton - 2009 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 37 (4):382 - 414.
The Ethics of Killing in War.Jeff McMahan - 2004 - Ethics 114 (4):693-733.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-09-13

Total downloads

22 ( #228,462 of 2,171,921 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #326,615 of 2,171,921 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums